Sociology of Risk and Safety in training sociologists
Societal cognitive security and its guarantors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19488000 |
|---|---|
| Authors | T A Khagurov (0000-0001-9941-9503, Kuban State University), M M Medvedev (Kuban State University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 158-171 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | RUDN Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2313-2272 • E-ISSN: 2408-8897 |
| Publisher | Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.22363/2313-2272-2026-26-1-158-171 |
| OpenAlex | W7154626152 |
| Language | EN |
The article considers the crisis of today’s education as a consequence of the systemic impact of global challenges, leading to the deformation of the classical triad - understanding, goal setting, action. The relevance of the study is determined by the combination of long-term trends (globalization, information revolution, consumerization) and new threats (hybrid wars, explosive development of AI, use of ICS) to the cognitive and value security of society, which turns education into a frontline in geopolitical confrontation. The authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of the challenges and threats for each stage of the education triad under hybrid wars and global competition, outlining the contours of a strategic response within the framework of social-humanitarian knowledge and educational policy. The theoretical-methodological basis of the article is a critical analysis of the concepts of the network society, “liquid modernity”, globalization and consumer society and a riskological approach that allows for integration of social, information and educational processes into a single subject field of security studies. The authors show that today “understanding” is blocked by information overload and fragmented worldview, “goal setting” is eroded by marketization and external value-based aggression leading to anomie, and “activity” loses its creative and collective meaning, being reduced to a formal competence or a tool for individualistic competition. Thus, we need a transition from narrowly focused prevention to a comprehensive strategy to simultaneously develop holistic worldview, value consciousness and socially significant practice, for which the authors propose a specific institutional framework - the Master’s program in Sociology of Risk and Security
Consciousness · Globalization · Individualism · Marketization · Reflexivity · Risk society · Terrorism · Educational Innovations and Challenges · Innovations in Education and Learning Technologies · Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |