A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Contemporary Geospatial Approaches to Flood Hazard and Risk Assessment
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19489197 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Farah Gasmi (0009-0006-1541-1779, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville), Mohamed H Aly (0000-0003-1024-8651, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville) |
| Ano | 2026 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Fascículo | 5 |
| Páginas | 271 |
| Data de publicação | 2026-05-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Urban Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2413-8851 • E-ISSN: 2413-8851 |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/urbansci10050271 |
| OpenAlex | W7161008082 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 170 |
Due to climate change and its increased variability, as well as the extreme weather events, flooding is becoming a major natural threat causing profound economic, social, and ecological impact. This paper systematically reviews 89 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024 on flood risk assessment approaches, including geospatial techniques and methods for flooding, using the PRISMA framework and the ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases. GIS and remote sensing are the most popular tools for flood hazard mapping, and hydrodynamic models such as HEC-RAS and MIKE FLOOD dominate flood simulation. Machine learning algorithms, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), and climate scenario analysis have also emerged as increasingly prominent methodological contributions to flood risk frameworks. This review makes a novel contribution by providing the first systematic synthesis of geospatial flood risk assessment methods, explicitly quantifying both the urban–rural research imbalance and the degree of hazard, vulnerability, and exposure integration across the literature. Specifically, only 13 (2.7%) of all eligible articles addressed rural flooding, despite the profound socioeconomic impacts that disproportionately affect these communities, and only 16% of included studies integrated any combination of hazard, vulnerability, and exposure components within current assessment approaches. This review highlights the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and sensitivity to rural contexts in cultivating resilience and fostering equitable flood risk management
Climate change · Flood myth · Flood risk assessment · Geospatial analysis · Natural hazard · Psychological resilience · Risk assessment · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Hydrology and Drought Analysis · Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
A multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience in Tehran, Iran
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Comparing spatially explicit approaches to assess social vulnerability dynamics to flooding
Explainable artificial intelligence in disaster risk management
Evaluating urban flood risk using hybrid method of Topsis and machine learning
The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Earth observations into action
Systematic Bibliographic Database Searching for an Overview of Reviews
Should Swedish sea level planners worry more about mean sea level rise or sea level extremes
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |