Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ornamental Grammar as Cultural Memory

Mother Goddess Sculptures and Visual Knowledge Systems in Mauryan–śuṅga India (321–72 Bce)

Bibliographic Data

ID19489980
AuthorsRudrajit Bose (0000-0001-9243-070X), Shilpi Bora (0000-0003-3632-3293, Central University of Gujarat)
Year2026
Volume7
Issue15s
Publication date2026-06-06
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2582-7472 • E-ISSN: 2582-7472
PublisherGranthaalayah Publications and Printers (PUBLISHER • IN)
DOI10.29121/shodhkosh.v7.i15s.2026.8419
OpenAlexW7165902065
LanguageEN
References cited5

Jewellery configurations on South Asian sacred images are seldom read as primary historical evidence. This paper examines thirty-four verified mother goddess sculptures drawn from published museum catalogues and institutional databases, spanning Mauryan–Śuṅga India (c. 321–72 BCE) and the early Kuśāṇa period, and asks what kept their ornamental patterns structurally stable. Adornment conventions held across more than 1,800 kilometres and c. 250 years of Maurya–Śuṅga production. They survived the fall of centralised Mauryan authority in 185 BCE and two subsequent dynastic transitions. Specimens were selected to maximise geographic and material heterogeneity; feature coding drew on six categories from Marshall and Foucher (1940) and Coomaraswamy (1928), with on-site examination at four Indian and two international institutions. The frequencies returned are high. 74 % of specimens carry multi-strand necklaces, 97 % wear waist girdles, and every complete figure shows ankle ornaments. These are not artefacts of specimen selection. Four mechanisms explain the durability. Redundancy through serial mould production; graduated material access from expensive stone to cheap terracotta; body-zone mapping; and craft-guild apprenticeship. The Sanskrit epistemological lexicon — rūpadhāraṇā, svarūpa, lakṣaṇa, and prayoga — offers analytical precision that the English cognitive science vocabulary cannot supply on its own. The paper argues that non-centralised material preservation was not a fallback strategy but a structurally distinct mode of cultural transmission

Adornment · Grammar · Lexicon · Painting · Sanskrit · Sculpture · Vocabulary · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

  • King, Governance, and Law in Ancient India

    Patrick Olivelle, Kauṭalya Kauṭalya•King, Governance, and Law in…•2013

  • Cognition in the Wild

    Edwin Hutchins•Cognition in the Wild•1995

  • How Things Shape the Mind

    L Malafouris, Colin Renfrew•How Things Shape the Mind•2013

  • The Extended Mind

    Andy Clark, David J Chalmers et al.•Analysis•1998

  • How societies remember

    Paul Connerton•How societies remember•1989

Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae