“The authors have wasted their time…”

Genre features and language of anonymous peer reviews

Bibliographic Data

ID19498997
AuthorsTatyana Yakhontova (0000-0002-9327-6887, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv , Ukraine, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume20
Issue2
Pages67-89
Publication date2019-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTopics in Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1337-7590 • E-ISSN: 2199-6504
PublisherConstantine the Philosopher University in Nitra (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2478/topling-2019-0010
OpenAlexW2996840635
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited28

The anonymous peer review is an unpublished pre-publication review which evaluates research articles submitted to journals. This type of a review plays a special role in the genre landscape of Anglophone research by ensuring its appropriate quality and ethical standards. By performing this role, the peer review also realizes a didactic potential, as it motivates researchers to improve their investigations. This paper extends the existing research on the anonymous peer review and aims to deepen our understanding of this genre by analysing the overall functional organization of peer review texts and their prominent linguistic features shaped by three communicative functions ‒ “gatekeeping”, evaluative, and didactic. It also attempts to compare the characteristics of peer reviews in two research fields ideologically and epistemologically distant from each other ‒ applied linguistics and applied mathematics. The methodological framework of the study combines Swales’s move analysis and a functional stylistic perspective developed within the East European linguistic context. The analysis has revealed a three-move structure of review texts and disclosed the roles of interpersonal markers, evaluative lexis and four types of directives in the realization of the communicative functions of the genre. The typologies of reviewers’ comments and evaluative acts in reviews have also been suggested. Furthermore, the study has brought to light some quantitative and qualitative differences between the texts in two disciplines. It is anticipated that awareness of the linguistic conventions of anonymous peer reviews analysed in the paper will help researchers to perceive this genre as a valuable source of professional assistance and enlightenment

Ambiguity · Epistemology · Gatekeeping · Interpersonal communication · Lexis · Linguistics · Metadiscourse · Political science · Sociology · Systemic functional linguistics · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access