Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Livestock carrying capacity evaluation in an integrated farming system

A case study from the mid-hills of Nepal

Bibliographic Data

ID19499722
AuthorsRomy Das, Ganesh P Shivakoti (0000-0001-7187-2111)
Year2006
Volume13
Issue3
Pages153-163
Publication date2006-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1350-4509 • E-ISSN: 1745-2627
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13504500609469668
OpenAlexW1983823355
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The crop livestock integrated farming system practiced in hilly regions of developing countries largely depends on the ecosystem as a whole. More especifically, the livestock component of the farming system relies heavily on natural resources such as forest, grazing and agricultural land for the supply of feed and fodder. The importance of animals as agents of nutrient recycling, sources of rural energy in terms of draft power and fuel, as well as being major contributors to the farm economy, has resulted in an increased population of ruminants in these regions, creating a threat to the sustainability and productivity of these land resources. This paper is an attempt to evaluate the livestock carrying capacity of land resources and to formulate the optimum herd size compatible with the differently resourced farm categories within the sub-watershed region of the mid-hills in Nepal. Our analysis reveals that the livestock carrying capacity of the land resources at the watershed level is 11696 Livestock Units (LU), whereas current stocking is 12985 LU, suggesting an overstocking of 1289 LU at the watershed level. Total feed supply from different sources is 12668 mt/yr whereas current Total Digestive Nutrient (TDN) demand is 14060 mt/yr, a negative balance of 1393 mt/yr. The excess livestock at the sub-watershed level directly implies excess livestock holding, producing a poor nutritional status for the farm household. Linear programming analysis reveals that the farmers of large, medium and small category farms can optimize their livestock holding by a combination of 3 LU buffaloes and 4 LU goats, 2 LU buffaloes and 4 LU goats and 1 LU buffaloes and 4.4 LU goats, thus giving maximum return to the farm family without exerting pressure on fragile natural resources. Keywords: LIVESTOCK UNITCARRYING CAPACITYLAND RESOURCESOPTIMUM HERD SIZETOTAL DIGESTIVE NUTRIENTSUPPLY

Agricultural economics · Agricultural science · Agriculture · Agroforestry · Agronomy · Biology · Business · Carrying capacity · Economics · Fodder · Geography · Grazing · Land use · Livestock · Mixed farming · Productivity · Sustainability · Watershed · Agricultural Systems and Practices · Agriculture and Rural Development Research · Environmental Science · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Ecology · Forestry

  • European Countries Trapped in Food Poverty and Inequality

    Open Access•Khalid Zaman, Talat Islam et al.•Social Indicators Research•2016

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0.1
Citation span2016 - 2016 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae