Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bibliometric analysis of piosphere research

Implications for conservation and scientific collaboration

Bibliographic Data

ID19499752
AuthorsEahsan Shahriary (Environmental Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA, corresponding author), Thomas E Gill (0000-0001-9011-4105, Environmental Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA), Richard P Langford (0000-0002-4979-461X, Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, USA)
Year2021
Volume28
Issue4
Pages316-325
Publication date2021-05-19
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1350-4509 • E-ISSN: 1745-2627
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13504509.2020.1821256
OpenAlexW3100234770
LanguageEN
References cited62

The concept of the piosphere is important in rangeland management, wildlife management, desertification. Piosphere research describes the changes in soil, biota and fauna as a function of distance from water sources utilized by grazing animals. Piosphere research has provided a better understanding of how grazing pressure can affect local environments. We conducted a bibliometric analysis to describe the progress of piosphere knowledge between 1915 and 2018. This is the first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of piosphere research, and it provides insights on future challenges, research challenges, and knowledge gaps. Google Scholar was used to identify 875 publications from 68 countries and 10 different languages. Our analyses showedthat research article was the most frequent publication type and piosphere was the most frequent keyword. Australia was first in the number of publications followed by South Africa and USA. Ivan Thrash is the most contributed author with 11 publications. The most frequently cited article is ‘Responses of Mediterranean grassland plants to grazing and protection’ in The Journal of Ecology. Herbivores, vegetation, soil, livestock, wildlife, and ecological were the most frequent research areas of piosphere investigations. English was the major and dominant language of piosphere publications. Rapid growth was found in piosphere research since the 1990s, enlivened by advances in statistics, remote sensing, GIS, and programming. We recommend that future research should investigate knowledge gaps such as grazing system relationships to piosphere patterns, economic analysis of watering point development and closure, and the implications of climate change and new piospheres

Agroforestry · Biology · Desertification · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Grazing · Rangeland · Wildlife · Ecology and biodiversity studies · Environmental Science · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Ecology

  • Canonical Correspondence Analysis

    Open Access•Cajo J F Ter Braak•Ecology•1986

  • Bibliometric analysis of ecosystem monitoring-related research in Africa

    Armand Sèdami Igor Yêvidé, Bingfang Wu et al.•International Journal of…•2016

  • Pastoralists as Optimal Foragers? Reoccupation and Site Selection in the Deserts of Post-Soviet Kazakhstan

    Open Access•Robinson, Carol Kerven et al.•Human Ecology•2017

  • A Bibliometric Analysis of the Impacts of Air Pollution on Children

    Open Access•Jinfang Sun, Zhichao Zhou et al.•International Journal of…•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae