Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Socioeconomics of biodiversity conservation in the protected areas

A case study in Bangladesh

Bibliographic Data

ID19500175
AuthorsMohammad Mahfuzur Rahman (0000-0002-6295-8156, University of Chittagong, corresponding author), Md Abdullah Al Mahmud (0000-0001-7370-9940, University of Chittagong), Mohammad Shahidullah (0000-0002-1142-4242, University of Chittagong)
Year2017
Volume24
Issue1
Pages65-72
Publication date2017-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1350-4509 • E-ISSN: 1745-2627
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13504509.2016.1169453
OpenAlexW2321303120
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited24

Kaptai National Park (KNP) was declared a protected area (PA) in 1999 to protect its degrading biodiversity. This created conflicts between the forest-dependent communities and the KNP managers since in a PA everything is prohibited unless permitted. For the effective conservation of biodiversity resources of the PAs, Bangladesh has adopted forest co-management systems where forest-dependent people play an important role. Surveying a total of 150 households and using generalized logistic regressions, this study has investigated the socioeconomic factors that affect people’s attitude towards biodiversity conservation of KNP and the level of their dependency on its resources. The study revealed that education, income, and forest dependency were positively linked to the likelihood of people’s supports for management of KNP as a PA. However, the distance of household from KNP had a negative relationship with such perception. Similarly, people’s income from forest, permanent residency in the study area, and forest-related occupation were positively aligned with their forest dependency. However, their education level significantly reduced their dependency on forest resources. Thus, educating the forest-dependent people, empowering the local and co-management communities, and supporting alternative income generation activities should be appreciated for effective management of KNP. The study has identified the factors that require sufficient attention of the policymakers and forest managers to enhance biodiversity conservation at KNP and other PAs of the country

Agroforestry · Biodiversity · Biodiversity conservation · Business · Economics · Environmental health · Environmental resource management · Forest management · Geography · Household income · Population · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Ecology · Forestry

  • Exclosures in people’s minds

    Open Access•Dawit Gebregziabher, Arezoo Soltani•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Analyzing multi-temporal satellite imagery and stakeholders' perceptions to have an insight into how forest co-management is changing the protected area landscapes in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Kazi Nazrul Islam, Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Distribution pattern of traditional ecological knowledge on plant utilization among major minority peoples in Guizhou, China

    S Mao, Yuan Shen et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Levels of community participation and satisfaction with decentralized wildlife management in Idodi-Pawaga Wildlife Management Area, Tanzania

    Wilhelm Andrew Kiwango, Hans C Komakech et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • Biomass and carbon budgeting of sustainable agroforestry systems as ecosystem service in Indian Himalayas

    R P Yadav, B Gupta et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Socioeconomics and sources of livelihood security in Central Himalaya, India

    R P Yadav, B Gupta et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • People’s dependency on forest resources and contributions of forests to the livelihoods

    Morgubatul Jannat, Mohammed Kamal Hossain et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • Exploring Community Perceptions and Attitudes toward Protected Areas in Myanmar

    Open Access•Su Shwe Sin Phyoe, Thazin Htay et al.•Human Ecology•2023

  • Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India

    Open Access•Nagothu Udaya Sekhar•Journal of Environmental Management•2003

  • Is community-based forest management more effective than protected areas?

    Open Access•Edward A Ellis, Luciana Porter-Bolland•Forest Ecology and Management•2008

  • Does Community-Based Conservation Shape Favorable Attitudes Among Locals? An Empirical Study from Nepal

    Open Access•JAI N MEHTA, Joel T Heinen•Environmental Management•2001

  • The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania

    Open Access•SARAH GILLINGHAM, P C Lee•Environmental Conservation•1999

  • Perceptions and attitudes of local residents on a nature reserve

    Hongbing Deng, Zhefei Chen et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Local Community Attitudes toward Forests Outside Protected Areas in India. Impact of Legal Awareness, Trust, and Participation

    Open Access•Biljana Macura, Francisco Zorondo-Rodríguez et al.•Conservation Ecology•2011

  • Economic dependence on forest resources

    Open Access•Getachew Mamo, Espen Sjaastad et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2006

  • Community forest management in Mexico

    Open Access•Daniel Klooster, Omar Masera•Global Environmental Change•2000

  • Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households

    Open Access•William Cavendish•World Development•2000

  • An analysis of conservation attitudes and awareness around Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India

    Open Access•Joel T Heinen, Rahul J Shrivastava•Population and Environment•2009

  • Integrating Protected Area Management with Local Needs and Aspirations

    Michael P Wells, Thomas O Mcshane•AMBIO•2004

Citations per year0.89
Citation span2017 - 2023 (7)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae