Positions, Power and Practice
Functionalist Approaches and Translation Quality Assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19501037 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans G Hönig (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1997 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 6-34 |
| Publication date | 1997-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Current Issues In Language and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1352-0520 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13520529709615477 |
| OpenAlex | W2016760273 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 2 |
Translation quality assessment (TQA) is an essential part of any theoretical concept of translation. Models of TQA will therefore inevitably reflect an overall theoretical framework (or lack of it) and can be discussed in terms of such. On the other hand, TQA is carried out daily, often in an unreflected and sometimes authoritarian way. Empirical data from the translator's workbench must therefore be taken into account if one wants to provide a basis for an informed use of TQA in translator training. My arguments will therefore be based on many authentic examples of TQA as it is practised and on an overview of frequently used evaluation scenarios. This will provide an empirical base for a detailed discussion of theoretical concepts (mainly Gutt's relevance concept and Kussmaul's functional approach). The first part illustrates that popular concepts of translation are not built on a tabula rasa. Laypersons hold dogmatic positions, particularly those of 'faithfulness' and 'cultural neutrality'. These are shown to be basically functionalist concepts, albeit not recognised as such. Gutt's criticism of translation theory in general and functionalism in particular is discussed. The second part provides an overview of how TQA is carried out (in Germany) in various scenarios. This will show that TQA, as practised in the university training of translators, uses the least homogeneous criteria and seems to be neither integrated into theoretical frameworks nor based on requirements typically made by clients. The only way out of this pedagogical dilemma, it is argued, is to use TQA as a means and not as an end
Dilemma · Epistemology · Linguistics · Polysemy · Translation studies · Computer Science · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Artificial Intelligence
A Summative Translation Quality Assessment Model for Undergraduate Student Translations
The translator's visibility
A Global Language for the Global Village? A Response to Mary Snell-Hornby
A corpus-based error typology
Translating sensitive texts
Success in translation
Assessment of Translation
Translation quality assessment practices of faculty members of colleges of languages and translation in Arab countries
Feeling foreign
Challenges of translating qualitative management data
The Rôle of Theory in Translator Training
The Translation of Judgments
Towards a Methodology for a Corpus-Based Approach to Translation Evaluation
Translation in Literary Discourse
The Good Guys and the Bad Guys
Punto de vista interno y externo sobre la traducción
A Corpus-Based Evaluation Approach to Translation Improvement
Understanding the Processes of Translation and Transliteration in Qualitative Research
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,62 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2026 (30) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |