The discrimination of phonological and grammatical categories by Cantonese-speaking children
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19502225 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Him Cheung (0000-0002-1553-2339, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 163-178 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asia Pacific Journal of Speech Language and Hearing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1361-3286 • E-ISSN: 2058-0967 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1179/136132801805576581 |
| OpenAlex | W2015287833 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
Three large groups of Cantonese-speaking children were tested on their abilities to discriminate minimally contrastive syllables and comprehend certain grammatical structures in spoken sentences. Results from the younger (n = 130; mean age = 43.5 months), middle (n = 252; mean age = 53.2 months) and older children (n = 101; mean age = 63.3 months) converged in showing that: (1) the aspiration contrast was the most difficult to master, compared with the manner and place contrasts; (2) the Cantonese /n/-/l/ opposition had lost most of its contrastive value; (3) the active construction, which follows the basic Cantonese SVO word order, together with its negation, was acquired early;(4) perfective and plural marking were of medium difficulty; (5) passives were acquired very late; (6) non-obligatory future marking via the use of /wuj5/ was acquired very late. These results reinforce previous findings based on very small, or single-subject, samples in Cantonese and Mandarin child language. They also provide a frame of reference for the speech-and-hearing pathologist working with Cantonese-speaking children, in that clinical data could be interpreted in light of the present findings
Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Morpheme · Negation · Plural · Word order · Language Development and Disorders · Philosophy · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology · Voice and Speech Disorders
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |