Who rules? The United Nations
Democratic and representative
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19502624 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricia McKenna (Royal Irish Academy, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 32-46 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medicine Conflict & Survival (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1362-3699 • E-ISSN: 1743-9396 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13623699908409423 |
| OpenAlex | W1992073892 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
The United Nations as presently constituted is undemocratic, unrepresentative and underfunded, and reform is urgently needed. All countries, not least the United States which owes half the UN debt, must pay their dues, but other sources of funding such as a levy on currency trading should be explored. Reform of the Security Council, though important, will be difficult to achieve, and the immediate priority must be to tackle the social and economic problems and abuses of human rights which underlie most conflict. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank must be returned to UN control and the influence of transnational corporations curbed. The increasing role of Non‐Governmental Organizations is welcome, and a People's Assembly parallel to the General Asembly should be encouraged. The role of the UN in conflict resolution should not be taken over by bodies such as the European Union or NATO; preventive diplomacy under Chapters VI and VIII of the UN Charter should be given priority over peace enforcement under Chapter VII
Charter · Currency · Debt · Democracy · Economics · Enforcement · General assembly · Human rights · International community · Political science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Public Administration · Finance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|