Legal liability for Agent Orange-related illnesses
A reassessment of the 2005 Vava case and prospects for new litigation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19502934 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Felix Klickermann (Trinity College Dublin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 138-152 |
| Publication date | 2016-04-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medicine Conflict & Survival (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1362-3699 • E-ISSN: 1743-9396 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13623699.2016.1242044 |
| PMID | 27748632 |
| OpenAlex | W2534824291 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
Attempts through the US courts to hold the corporations responsible for the production of dioxin-contaminated herbicides used by the US military in the 1960s and early 1970s liable for their ongoing health consequences have failed. This article scrutinizes the most recent judgement - that of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York handed down in 2005 following a lawsuit brought by the Vietnam Association of Victims of Agent Orange/dioxin (VAVA). It is argued that despite this judgement there is the potential to bring a further legal case, with some prospect of success, on the basis of: (i) debatable legal judgements in the 2005 decision; (ii) new scientific evidence on the health effects of exposure to Agent Orange; and (iii) cases brought in other jurisdictions. The article concludes by noting the underfunding of ongoing remediation efforts, especially for the provision of assistance to affected individuals, and argues that it is desirable to oblige the producers of the herbicides to contribute financially to these efforts
Actuarial science · Agent Orange · Business · Economics · Law and economics · Liability · Political science · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Law · Legal case studies and regulations · Regulation and Compliance Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|