Attacks on healthcare in conflict
Generating attention in the modern information landscape
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19503129 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Heather Lynne Zimmerman (Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK, corresponding author), Michelle Mülhausen (Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK), Emma Tuck (Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 12-42 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medicine Conflict & Survival (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1362-3699 • E-ISSN: 1743-9396 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13623699.2019.1573801 |
| PMID | 30760024 |
| OpenAlex | W2913397973 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 32 |
Attacks on healthcare in conflict (AHCC) is receiving increased attention as a pressing global concern from humanitarian organisations, the media, policymakers, academics, and the public. This study examines the extent to which this increased attention leads to mainstream reporting and understanding of AHCC that is representative of reality by investigating the ways that information and knowledge about the issue is produced. Based on a rapid review of documentation on AHCC since 2011, this is one of the first studies to assess the rigour, validity, and representativeness of mainstream data on AHCC. Findings indicate that information and knowledge about AHCC is molded by a particular representation of the issue created by international media and humanitarian organisations seeking to capture public and political attention. This dominant understanding is not representative of the complex reality of AHCC, but is instead driven by organisational objectives and advocacy agendas. These findings hold important implications for the above-mentioned stakeholders by exploring the complexity and impacts of documenting AHCC. Most notably, the research investigates the relationship between information and understanding about the issue and the action that it encourages
Documentation · Epistemology · Mainstream · Political science · Public relations · Representativeness heuristic · Rigour · Sociology · Computer Science · Health and Conflict Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Qualitative Research
Capitalizing on the look
Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research
Discipline and Punish
Discipline and Punish
The Legitimacy of Humanitarian Actions and their Media Representation
The Market for News
May We Have Your Attention Please? Human-Rights NGOs and the Problem of Global Communication
A World of Emergencies
The risks of instrumentalizing the narrative on sexual violence in the DRC
A way forward in protecting health services in conflict
Modeling the Negotiation of Newsworthiness
Global Humanitarianism and the Changing Aid-Media Field
Post-humanitarianism
Epistemic Communities, Epistemes and the Construction of (World) Politics
A Comparative Discussion of the Notion of 'Validity' in Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Determinants of International Emergency Aid—Humanitarian Need Only
The Other Side of the CNN Factor
The Neglect of Africa and the Power of Aid
Introduction
The hidden costs of power-sharing
Framing
Dangerous tales
Focus on the CNN Effect Misses the Point
The Death of Humanitarianism
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2023 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |