Look who’s taking notes in your clinic
Mystery shoppers as evaluators in sexual health services
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19505893 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paula Baraitser (0000-0002-3354-6494, Lambeth Hospital), Vikki Pearce, Nathalie Walsh (London Borough of Southwark), Richard Cooper (0000-0002-3037-7779), Kirsty Collander Brown, Jo Holmes, Lovelle Smith, Petra Boynton (0000-0001-6699-2266, University College London) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 54-62 |
| Publication date | 2008-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00467.x |
| PMID | 18275402 |
| OpenAlex | W2034492413 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 10 |
Objectives To test the feasibility of professional patients as a tool for sexual health service evaluation. Professional patients are paid to use services specifically for audit or evaluation purposes without disclosing their identity as evaluators. Methods Professional patients visited five large sexual health departments used by 3000 clients per week in two inner London Boroughs with very high rates of sexual ill health. They recorded their experience on a structured evaluation form. Semi‐structured telephone interviews were completed with seven service providers to document their experience of the programme. Results Recruitment and training for professional patients is described. Forty professional patients made 105 visits during two rounds of visits 9 months apart. After 47% (round 1) and 62% (round 2) of visits, the professional patients felt that they would recommend the service to a friend. The professional patients provided detailed and specific feedback on all aspects of service provision. This information was highly valued by service providers who reported few objections from staff to the visits. A small number of examples of very poor care were documented. Conclusions Professional patients are a useful tool for sexual health service evaluation. They provide high quality feedback because they are both ‘experts’ on sexual health service provision and users of sexual health services. This method of evaluation raises ethical issues about the acceptability of deception as part of the evaluation process, the right of staff to anonymity and to refuse to be visited. Professional patient programmes provide an opportunity for regular cycles of user feedback to monitor quality improvement
Anonymity · Audit · Business · Deception · Family medicine · Health care · Medical education · Reproductive health · HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology · Sexual function and dysfunction studies · Social Psychology
How Do You Modernize a Health Service? A Realist Evaluation of Whole‐Scale Transformation in London
A systematic review of the use of adolescent mystery clients in assessing the adolescent friendliness of health services in high, middle, and low-income countries
What shapes employees’ acceptance of and engagement with mystery patient programs for service quality improvement? A qualitative application of the Theory of Planned Behavior
Involvement of Lay Assessors in the Inspection and Regulation of Public Services
| Citations per year | 0.24 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Highly cited | No |