Patient perspectives on health advice posted on Internet discussion boards
A qualitative study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19506280 |
|---|---|
| Authors | N Armstrong (0000-0003-4046-0119, University of Leicester), Jami Powell (0000-0002-1456-4857, University of Warwick), John Powell (0000-0001-6124-439X) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 313-320 |
| Publication date | 2009-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00543.x |
| PMID | 19555377 |
| OpenAlex | W2005905305 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 16 |
| References cited | 25 |
Background Use of the Internet for health information by patients is growing, and there have been diverse responses to this both within the research community and the medical and health‐related professions. The use of Internet discussion boards are one way that people living with long‐term conditions can interact with their peers and offer and seek advice, support and information. We report patient perspectives on using a discussion board within a wider pilot study of an Internet‐based self‐management system for diabetes. Design Qualitative data was gathered during three stages of developing and piloting the wider self‐management system. These are: (1) patient focus groups as part of a stakeholder consultation; (2) a pre‐test session and focus group; and 3. a 6‐month pilot study including follow‐up individual interviews. Results Three main themes were identified within participants’ perspectives on Internet discussion boards. First, a focus on the importance and value of peer support to these patients. Secondly, participants’ awareness of the need to evaluate the information posted by others in light of their own circumstances. Thirdly, the value placed upon the experiential knowledge of others living with the same condition. Conclusions Many people living with long‐term conditions would like to be in contact with their peers, and Internet discussion boards represent a cost‐effective and interactive way of achieving this. Within the context of diabetes, the knowledge and expertise accumulated over many years of self‐management is central to participants’ self‐reported ability to evaluate information posted and make decisions on its possible use
Discussion board · Internet privacy · Medical education · MEDLINE · Political science · Qualitative research · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Diabetes Management and Education · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Medicine · Psychology · Social Media in Health Education
Knowledge sharing in online health communities
Health and Illness in a Connected World
Online Social Networking by Patients with Diabetes
The future of mental health care
Parkinson’s Disease and Deep Brain Stimulation Have an Impact on My Life
Digital Compassion
Centering culture in health promotion education
Curating the digital space
‘No matter what time of day’
Medical terminology in online patient–patient communication
Is nicotine replacement therapy overvalued in smoking cessation? Analysis of smokers' and quitters' communication in social media
Typology of online mental health peer support for young people
The Influence of Self-Disclosure in Online Support Seeking on Quality of Received Advice
Oh dear, should I really be saying that on here
Being differently the same
Online Peer-to-Peer Communities in the Daily Lives of People With Chronic Illness
Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups
Self-efficacy
Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups.
Health E-types
Researching the 'Informed Patient
Information in mental health
Self-efficacy
Medicine on the line? Computer‐mediated social support and advice for people with diabetes
The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence
Ignorance is bliss sometimes
| Citations per year | 1.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Highly cited | No |