User involvement in the development of a research bid
Barriers, enablers and impacts 1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19506281 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sophie Staniszewska (0000-0002-7723-9074), Nicola Jones (0000-0002-9164-7947, National Childbirth Trust), N R Jones (0000-0002-5742-4598), Mary Newburn (0000-0001-9471-0908, National Childbirth Trust), Shanit Marshall |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 173-183 |
| Publication date | 2007-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00436.x |
| PMID | 17524010 |
| OpenAlex | W2143656101 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
| References cited | 12 |
Objective To involve users in the development of a research bid to examine parents’ experiences of having a pre‐term baby, and to examine the barriers, enablers and impacts of user involvement. Design A mainly collaborative approach to user involvement was adopted, although different types of involvement were evident at different stages of the project. Users’ experiences and perspectives provided the focus for the regular meetings which underpinned the writing of the research bid. The researcher acted as a facilitator in the development of the bid, with input from users and the wider advisory group. Main outcomes User involvement had an important impact on the development of the research aims, methods and on ethical aspects. Through careful collaboration a research bid was produced which was rooted in users’ experiences, whilst also addressing key research questions. Key enablers for involvement included good working relationships, funding for the lead researchers time. Barriers included lack of financial support for users, the time‐consuming nature of involvement and the language of research. Conclusions If user involvement remains an international policy imperative with little if any support at the vital stage of bid development, policy‐makers, service user organizations, researchers, health service providers and commissioners will need to recognize the limited nature of involvement that may result and the impact this would have on the evidence base. Researchers will need to recognize the resource implications of involvement at this point, and user groups will need to decide whether to participate when there is the greatest chance of influencing research but little or no funding
Business · Knowledge management · Process management · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Mobilising the experiential knowledge of clinicians, patients and carers for applied health-care research
Patient and Public Involvement in Sexual and Reproductive Health
Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research
Incorporating patient and public involvement (PPI) at the design stage of an early career physiotherapy researcher's funding application
Giving Voice to Patients
Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research
Getting ready for user involvement in a systematic review
Use of the Adapte method to develop a clinical guideline for the improvement of psychoses and schizophrenia care
Evaluation of a project to engage patients in the development of a patient‐reported measure for HIV care (the I‐Score Study)
Involving service users in intervention design
Openness, inclusion and transparency in the practice of public involvement in research
Process and impact of patient involvement in a systematic review of shared decision making in primary care consultations
Meaningful patient and public involvement in digital health innovation, implementation and evaluation
‘But is it a question worth asking?’ A reflective case study describing how public involvement can lead to researchers’ ideas being abandoned
Involving service users in the development of the S upport at H ome
A coproduced patient and public event
What is involvement in research and what does it achieve? Reflections on a pilot study of the personal costs of stroke
Developing a research community within an online healthcare feedback platform
What women want from women's reproductive health research
Collaboration and co‐ownership in research
How and why should we engage parents as co‐researchers in health research? A scoping review of current practices
A qualitative evaluation of coproduction of research
“Maybe they have found something new” participants’ views on returning cohort psychosocial survey results
Patient and service user engagement in research
Supporting public involvement in research design and grant development
Patients as Partners in Responsive Research
Involving consumers in a needs‐led research programme
Involving users in low back pain research
Medical messages in the media – barriers and solutions to improving medical journalism
Evolving the multiple roles of ‘patients’ in health‐care research
Involving older people in research
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2024 (17) |
| Highly cited | No |