Mirror meetings with frail older people and multidisciplinary primary care teams
Process and impact analysis
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 19506366 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sietske Grol (0000-0002-9917-6932, Department of Primary and Community Care Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands, autor de correspondencia), Gerard Molleman (0000-0003-1991-6273, Department of Primary and Community Care Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands, autor de correspondencia), Henk Schers (0000-0002-9362-9451, Department of Primary and Community Care Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 22 |
| Número | 5 |
| Páginas | 993-1002 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hex.12905 |
| PMID | 31124271 |
| OpenAlex | W2946322752 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 39 |
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the process and impact of confronting multidisciplinary teams (MTs) in primary care with the experiences of frail older patients through mirror meetings (MMs), with the aim of supporting teams to organize care in a more patient-oriented way. METHODS: Process and impact analyses were performed using a mixed-method approach. MMs were held with 14 frail older patients and four MTs comprising 23 health-care professionals (HCPs) in primary care in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Mirror meetings were feasible for frail older people living at home, although their recruitment was time-consuming. Interaction between the patients was scarce, but they valued the opportunity to share their stories. HCPs preferred MMs overwritten reports about patient experiences. An impact analysis revealed four dominant professional areas for improvement: improve alignment with patient goals, improved communication with patients both orally and in writing, developing new pathways to connect with informal caregivers and an increased understanding that most HCPs are relative strangers to their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Mirror meetings are a relatively simple and promising method for exploring the ways in which frail older patients experience care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Given the right conditions, MMs could result in valuable processes to enable MTs to improve their working methods
Family medicine · Health care · Health professionals · Medical education · Multidisciplinary approach · Multidisciplinary team · Older people · Primary care · Sociology · Computer Science · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Gerontology
Organising and managing patient and public involvement to enhance quality improvement—Comparing a Swedish and a Dutch hospital
General practitioners’ views on the influence of long-term care reforms on integrated elderly care in the Netherlands
Mirror meetings with frail older people and multidisciplinary primary care teams
Ageing in the European Union
Experience-based design
Frailty in elderly people
Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design
Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe
Mirror meetings with frail older people and multidisciplinary primary care teams
Outcome Indicators on Interprofessional Collaboration Interventions for Elderly
Integrated care
Social Network Typologies and Mental Health Among Older Adults
Formal and informal care for community‐dwelling frail elderly people over time
The inter-relationship between formal and informal care
Linkages between informal and formal care-givers in home-care networks of frail older adults
Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,43 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2022 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |