Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

‘Dignity and respect’

An example of service user leadership and co‐production in mental health research

Bibliographic Data

ID19506504
AuthorsAlison Faulkner (0000-0003-3308-3925, Independent Service User/Survivor Researcher London UK, corresponding author), Sarah Carr (0000-0002-5301-9456, Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine Middlesex University London London UK), Dorothy Gould (Independent Service User/Survivor Researcher London UK), Christine Khisa (Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine Middlesex University London London UK), Trish Hafford‐letchfield (0000-0003-0105-0678, Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine Middlesex University London London UK), Rachel Cohen (0000-0002-5277-1822, Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine Middlesex University London London UK), Claudia Megele (Service for Quality Assurance and PSW Wiltshire Council London UK), Jessica Holley (0000-0001-7465-921X, Department of Mental Health, Social Work and Integrative Medicine Middlesex University London London UK)
Year2021
Volume24
IssueS1
Pages10-19
Publication date2021-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12963
PMID31556244
OpenAlexW2975450108
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited30

This paper explores the methodological aspects of a user‐led study investigating mental health service user experiences of targeted violence and abuse (often called 'hate crime'). 'Keeping Control' was a 16‐month qualitative study, undertaken in the context of adult safeguarding reforms in England. By collecting data on service user concepts and experiences, the research sought to address a gap in research and practice knowledge relating to targeted violence, abuse and hostility against people with mental health problems. In this paper, we discuss the significance of the design and methodology used for this study, with a particular focus on the interviews with service users. The research was both user‐led and carried out in collaboration with practitioners and academics, a form of research co‐production. Our aim is to inform researchers, practitioners and policymakers about the value of user leadership in co‐productive research with practitioners, particularly for a highly sensitive and potentially distressing topic

Business · Dignity · Focus group · Hostility · Mental health · Political science · Psychiatry · Public relations · Qualitative research · Safeguarding · Social science · Sociology · Elder Abuse and Neglect · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • It’s like an oak tree growing slowly across a barbed wire fence

    Open Access•Trish Hafford‐letchfield, Jeffrey R Hanna et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • It’s a Living Experience”

    Open Access•Trish Hafford‐letchfield, Jeffrey R Hanna et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Organizing for co-production

    Open Access•Britt Regal, Alexandra Budjanovcanin et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • I hate having my mental health’ – Making sense of mental health through coproduction and visual methods with young people with complex needs

    Open Access•W Sims-Schouten, Emma Maynard et al.•Journal of Youth Studies•2022

  • Practitioner perspectives on service users experiences of targeted violence and hostility in mental health and adult safeguarding

    Trish Hafford‐letchfield, Sarah Carr et al.•Disability & Society•2020

  • Findings from a European, cross-national project study on service user participation

    Open Access•Jim Campbell, Simon Donnelly et al.•International Social Work•2024

  • Implementing peer support work in mental health care in Germany

    Open Access•Sebastian Von Peter, Ute Maria Kraemer et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research

    Open Access•Natasha Y Sheikhan, Kerry Kuluski et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care

    Open Access•Éidín Ní Shé, Reema Harrison•Health Expectations•2021

  • Co-production in mental health care, research, and education

    Open Access•Dagim Dawit Gonsamo, Herman Hay Ming Lo et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Madness' after the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina - challenging dominant understandings of distress

    Open Access•Reima Ana Maglajlic, Halida Vejzagić et al.•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2024

  • Creative Ecologies in Borderline Personality Disorder Research

    Open Access•D X Harris, Stacy Holman Jones et al.•Qualitative Inquiry•2025

  • Participation in trauma research

    Open Access•Michael G Griffin, Patricia A Resick et al.•Journal of Traumatic Stress•2003

  • What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

    Open Access•S Clement, O Schauman et al.•Psychological Medicine•2015

  • Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research

    Jane Ritchie, Liz Spencer•Analyzing Qualitative Data•2010

  • ‘What difference does it make?’ Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients

    Open Access•Steve Gillard, Steven Gillard et al.•Health Expectations•2010

  • A review of factors which potentially influence decisions in adult safeguarding investigations

    Open Access•Patricia Trainor•The Journal of Adult Protection•2015

  • Enabling risk and ensuring safety

    Open Access•Sarah Carr•The Journal of Adult Protection•2011

  • The right to take risks

    Open Access•Alison Faulkner•The Journal of Adult Protection•2012

  • Investigating models of adult safeguarding in England – a mixed-methods approach

    Open Access•Caroline Norrie, M Stevens et al.•The Journal of Adult Protection•2014

  • Involvement of service users in adult safeguarding

    Open Access•Janet Wallcraft•The Journal of Adult Protection•2012

  • Adult protection and effective action in tackling violence and hostility against disabled people

    Open Access•Chih Hoong Sin, Annie Hedges et al.•The Journal of Adult Protection•2011

  • Producing different analytical narratives, coproducing integrated analytical narrative

    Steve Gillard, Rohan Borschmann et al.•International Journal of Social…•2011

  • Service user/survivor-led research in mental health

    Diana Rose•Disability & Society•2017

  • Survivor research and Mad Studies

    Alison Faulkner•Disability & Society•2017

  • Supporting the sustainability of Mad Studies and preventing its co-option

    Peter Beresford, Jasna Russo•Disability & Society•2016

  • Keeping Control”

    Open Access•Sarah Carr, Trish Hafford‐letchfield et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2019

  • What is an ‘adult protection’ issue? Victims, perpetrators and the professional construction of adult protection issues

    Open Access•Fiona Sherwood‐johnson, Fiona Johnson•Critical Social Policy•2012

  • Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes

    Open Access•Michelle Farr•Critical Social Policy•2018

  • Safeguarding and System Change

    Jill Manthorpe, M Stevens et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2009

  • Patient and Public Involvement in the Coproduction of Knowledge

    Open Access•Steve Gillard, Lucy Simons et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2012

Unique citing works12
Citations per year2
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae