Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What factors influence successful recruitment of siblings of individuals with first episode psychosis to e‐health interventions? A qualitative study

Bibliographic Data

ID19506893
AuthorsJacqueline Sin (0000-0003-0590-7165, Health Service & Population Research Department Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK, corresponding author), Claire Henderson (0000-0002-6998-5659, Health Service & Population Research Department Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK), Debbie Spain (0000-0002-7680-0237, MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK), Catherine Gamble (South West London & St George's Mental Health NHS Trust London UK), Ian Norman (0000-0001-7567-2977, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery King's College London London UK)
Year2017
Volume20
Issue4
Pages696-704
Publication date2017-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12508
PMID27709734
OpenAlexW2473737908
LanguageEN
References cited27

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to clinical research studies can prove complex. This is particularly true of mental health research, given factors such as confidentiality, capacity and consent, or when attempting to recruit family members as opposed to service users themselves. AIM: This study investigated the challenges experienced and strategies employed in the recruitment of siblings of people with first episode psychosis using Early Intervention in Psychosis Services (EIPS) in England. METHODS: As part of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an e-health intervention for siblings, we conducted a process evaluation study whereby semistructured interview was undertaken with clinical and research staff involved in recruitment of siblings. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twelve participants from six EIPS were interviewed. Data analysis revealed seven key themes: (i) limited comprehensive family data available; (ii) data governance and consent issues; (iii) organizational factors; (iv) convoluted recruitment methods; (v) concerns about service users' opinions; (vi) fluidity in siblings' needs and expectations; and (vii) strategies to enhance recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment challenges identified in this study concerned administrative, organizational, process and attitudinal issues. These are similar to other studies recruiting mental health service users as well as family members. Failure to recruit to target implies that studies are underpowered to detect potential statistically or clinically meaningful changes. Future studies should establish how best to enhance family inclusiveness in clinical practice and research

Developmental psychology · Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychological intervention · Psychosis · Qualitative research · Clinical Psychology · Ethics in Clinical Research · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Psychology

  • Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions

    Open Access•Ann Oakley, Vicki Strange et al.•BMJ•2006

  • Qualitative Methods for Health Research

    John Green, Judith Green et al.•Qualitative Methods for Health…•2018

  • Siblings of adults with schizophrenia

    Matthew J Smith, Jan S Greenberg et al.•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•2007

  • Foundations of Qualitative Research

    Jerry Willis•Foundations of Qualitative Research•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae