Are patients' decision‐making preferences being met
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 19506905 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Sarah Ford (0000-0001-6916-8782, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities), Theo Schofield, Tony Hope (University of Oxford) |
| Ano | 2003 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 72-80 |
| Data de publicação | 2003-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00211.x |
| PMID | 12603630 |
| OpenAlex | W2159531863 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 17 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
Objective To investigate the information and decision‐making expectations of general practice patients during real life consultations. Design Post‐consultation, quantitative patient preference and enablement questionnaire. Setting and participants Patients attending for routine appointments in general practice surgeries in Oxfordshire, UK. Results Thirteen Oxfordshire general practitioners (GPs) volunteered to take part and a total of 171 patients completed and returned the questionnaire. Between a quarter and one‐third of patients reported receiving less information than they desired, particularly in relation to the risks and benefits of medical treatments. Patients who preferred the doctor to make decisions for them (35%), were more likely to have their preferences met (64%) compared with patients wishing to share decisions (47%) or make their own (18%) who were less likely to achieve this role (52 and 41%, respectively). However, it could not be demonstrated unequivocally that these differences were statistically significant. In total, 61% of patients perceived that they achieved their preferred decision‐making role. No significant differences were found in post‐consultation enablement scores between any of the decision preference groups. Patients' assessments indicated that some doctors were more successful at achieving congruence than others. Conclusion The decision‐making preferences of general practice patients tend to vary. However, there was a substantial mismatch between the stated preferences of patients for the role they wanted to have in decision‐making and what they felt actually took place in their consultation. Therefore, it remains a challenge for doctors to match their consultation style to the decision‐making preferences of individual patients
Clinical decision making · Family medicine · General practice · Medical decision making · MEDLINE · Patient participation · Preference · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology
Patient preferences for shared decisions
Personality and Health Care Decision-Making Style
Patient participation in the discussions of options in Spanish primary care consultations
Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making
Observing decision‐making in the general practice consultation
Beyond needs and expectations
Unmet expectations in primary care and the agreement between doctor and patient
Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care
Can consultation skills training change doctors' behaviour to increase involvement of patients in making decisions about standard treatment and clinical trials
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision‐making in the consultation
Information, deliberation, and decisional control preferences for participation in medical decision‐making and its influencing factors among Chinese cancer patients
Considerations of ‘fit’ and patient involvement in decision making
Shared decision making in oncology
Perceptions around concordance – focus groups and semi‐structured interviews conducted with consumers, pharmacists and general practitioners
Patient-centered Involvement in Decision-Making
Involvement in treatment decision-making
A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making
Patients' Preferences for Participation in Clinical Decision Making
Physician Recommendations and Patient Autonomy
Partnerships with Patients
Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making Commentary
Decision making during serious illness
Decision‐making role preferences and information needs
Patient Information-Seeking Behaviors When Communicating With Doctors
Health promotion in primary care
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter
Doctor-patient communication about drugs
Patient participation in decision-making
The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement
Practitioner or Patient - Who's in Charge
| Obras citantes distintas | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,74 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2003 - 2021 (19) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 17 |