Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Experiences of Self‐Sampling and Future Screening Preferences in Non‐Attenders Who Returned an HPV Vaginal Self‐Sample in the YouScreen Study

Findings From a Cross‐Sectional Questionnaire

Bibliographic Data

ID19506926
AuthorsHannah Drysdale (0000-0002-4307-6166, Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine London UK, corresponding author), Laura A V Marlow (0000-0003-1709-2397, Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine London UK), Anita Lim (0000-0002-4407-7451, Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine London UK), Jo Waller (0000-0003-4025-9132, Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine London UK)
Year2024
Volume27
Issue4
Pagese14118-e14118
Publication date2024-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.14118
PMID38953514
OpenAlexW4400244797
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited37

Background We assessed experiences of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaginal self‐sampling and future screening preferences in an ethnically and socio‐economically diverse group of women overdue for cervical screening. Setting and Participants A postal questionnaire was embedded in the YouScreen self‐sampling trial in England: 32.5% (2712/8338) of kit completers returned the survey. Kit non‐completers were encouraged to return a questionnaire, but no responses were received. Participants were ethnically diverse (40.3% came from ethnic minority backgrounds), and 59.1% came from the two most deprived quintiles. Differences in confidence in kit completion, trust in the test results and intention to attend a follow‐up test if HPV‐positive were evaluated using Pearson's χ 2 analyses. Binary logistic regression models explored predictors of a future screening choice and preferences for urine versus vaginal self‐sampling. Results Most kit‐completers reported high confidence in self‐sampling (82.6%) and high trust in the results (79.9%), but experiences varied by ethnicity and screening status. Most free‐text comments were positive but some reported difficulties using the device, pain or discomfort. Most women would opt for self‐sampling in the future (71.3% vs. 10.4% for a clinician‐taken test) and it was more often preferred by ethnic minority groups, overdue screeners and never attenders. Urine self‐tests were preferred to vaginal tests (41.9% vs. 15.4%), especially among women from Asian, Black or Other Ethnic backgrounds. Conclusions Kit‐completers were confident, found the test easy to complete, and trusted the self‐sample results. However, experiences varied by ethnic group and some women highlighted difficulties with the kit. Most women would prefer self‐sampling in the future, but it was not a universal preference, so offering a choice will be important. Patient or Public Contribution We did not have direct patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in the questionnaire design. However, patients and public representatives did input into the design of the YouScreen trial and reviewed the wider study materials (e.g. participant information sheet). Trial Registration This questionnaire study was embedded in the YouScreen trial. The protocol for the YouScreen trial is available at https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12759467 . The National Institute for Health Research 43 Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN) Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS) ID is 4441934

Cross-sectional study · Family medicine · Self-disclosure · Self-report study · Cervical Cancer and HPV Research · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Psychology · Reproductive tract infections research · Social Psychology

  • Acceptability of Self‐Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England

    Open Access•Sophie Whitley, Rachel L Hawkins et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Investigating the Acceptability of Cervical Screening and Self‐Sampling in Postnatal Women at the 6‐Week Postnatal Check‐Up

    Open Access•Rebecca Newhouse, Lorna McWilliams et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • Detecting cervical precancer and reaching underscreened women by using HPV testing on self samples

    Open Access•Marc Arbyn, Sara Smith et al.•BMJ•2018

  • Does self-sampling for human papilloma virus testing have the potential to increase cervical cancer screening? An updated meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized clinical trials

    Open Access•Gianfranco Di Gennaro, Francesca Licata et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening

    Open Access•Holly Nishimura, Ping Teresa Yeh et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Women's perspectives on human papillomavirus self‐sampling in the context of the UK cervical screening programme

    Open Access•Denitza Williams, Myfanwy Davies et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  • Doctor-patient communication

    Open Access•L M L Ong, J C J M De Haes et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1995

  • Self-collected HPV Testing Improves Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening

    Open Access•C Sarai Racey, Diana R Withrow et al.•Canadian Journal of Public Health•2013

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae