Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Patient involvement in developing a patient‐targeted feedback intervention after depression screening in primary care within the randomized controlled trial GET.Feedback.GP

Bibliographic Data

ID19507672
AuthorsTharanya Seeralan (0000-0003-4431-0310, Department of Medical Psychology Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany, corresponding author), Martin Härter (0000-0001-7443-9890, Department of Medical Psychology Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Cornelia Koschnitzke (Member of the Participatory Research Team Hamburg Germany), Michael Scholl (0000-0001-7800-1781, Member of the Participatory Research Team Hamburg Germany), Sebastian Kohlmann (0000-0003-1307-4618, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Center for Internal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Marco Lehmann (0000-0002-8817-3365, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Center for Internal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Marion Eisele (Department of Primary Medical Care Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Lea‐Elena Braunschneider (0000-0003-0561-7897, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Center for Internal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Gabriella Marx (0000-0001-6807-9518, Department of Primary Medical Care Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Martin Scherer (0000-0003-3448-9679, Department of Primary Medical Care Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Bernd Löwe (0000-0003-4220-3378, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy Center for Internal Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Julia Luise Magaard (0000-0002-7771-4242, Department of Medical Psychology Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany), Anna Levke Brütt (0000-0002-4197-6048, Department of Medical Psychology Center for Psychosocial Medicine University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany)
Year2021
Volume24
IssueS1
Pages95-112
Publication date2021-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13039
PMID32286005
OpenAlexW3015689979
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited48

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly required in mental health services research. To empower patients to actively address depression, the GET.FEEDBACK.GP study evaluates a patient-targeted feedback intervention after depression screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). OBJECTIVE: To refine the patient-targeted feedback from a previous study within a participatory research team (PRT) by conducting workshops to investigate patients' needs and preferences for feedback. To evaluate the process and outcome of PPI. DESIGN: Patient and public involvement was carried out on the levels of collaboration and consultation. A PRT of patient partners and researchers planned and conducted three workshops with patients. Patients' needs were investigated using a focus group. Participants prioritized needs, discussed feedback drafts and evaluated two drafts using cognitive debriefings. Researchers of the PRT communicated the results at project level. PPI was evaluated using the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tools (PPEET). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sampling of N = 12 patients with experiences of depression participated in at least one workshop. RESULTS: Relevant content-related needs about feedback (eg no distinction between severe and moderate symptoms), recommendations for action and patient-relevant information were considered. Needs for comprehensible, valuing, nonstigmatizing language and design elements (eg dimensional bar) were implemented. Workshops and PRT were positively evaluated. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patient and public involvement influenced the content, wording and design of the feedback. Strengths include two levels of PPI, methodical diversity and purposeful sampling. Limitations include the lack of inclusion of patients who are unaware of their depression. The evaluated PPI concept can be useful for future studies

Cognition · Depressive symptoms · Focus group · Mental health · Patient Health Questionnaire · Psychiatry · Randomized controlled trial · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • GPs’ views on the use of depression screening and GP-targeted feedback

    Open Access•Lea‐Elena Braunschneider, Marco Lehmann et al.•Quality of Life Research•2020

  • A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholder Involvement in Decision-Making for Alcohol Treatment and Prevention Services

    Open Access•Hayley Alderson, Eileen Kaner et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Navigating Long‐Term Co‐Creative Research With Young Adults Diagnosed With Cancer

    Open Access•Sarah Marklund, Rebecca Skog et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research

    Open Access•Natasha Y Sheikhan, Kerry Kuluski et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Rationalizing the Influence of Co‐Design on Distress, Clinical Decision‐Making and Disease Self‐Management of Cancer Patients‐as‐Partners

    Open Access•Zahraa Alrayshouni, Alaa Dayekh et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Public and patient involvement in the development of an internet‐based guide for persistent somatic symptoms (Guide.PSS)

    Open Access•Eirin Fränkl, Nele Hasenbank et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Protocol Analysis

    K Anders Ericsson, Herbert A Simon•Protocol Analysis•1993

  • A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities

    Open Access•Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska et al.•The Patient - Patient-Centered…•2014

  • Screening for Depression in Adults

    Albert L Siu, and the US Preventive Services Task Force et al.•JAMA•2016

  • GRIPP2 reporting checklists

    Open Access•Sophie Staniszewska, Jo Brett et al.•Research Involvement and Engagement•2017

  • The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research

    Margaret Cargo, Shawna L Mercer•Annual Review of Public Health•2008

  • Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients

    Open Access•Angela Coulter, JO ELLINS•BMJ•2007

  • Mental Health Smartphone Apps

    Open Access•David Bakker, Nikolaos Kazantzis et al.•JMIR Mental Health•2016

  • Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research

    Open Access•Lawrence A Palinkas, Sarah Mccue Horwitz et al.•Administration and Policy in…•2015

  • The PHQ-9

    Kurt Kroenke, Robert L Spitzer et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2001

  • ‘The missing links’

    Open Access•Kristina Staley, Sarah Buckland et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research

    Open Access•Jo Brett, Sophie Staniszewska et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making

    Open Access•Aurelien Boivin, Audrey L'Espérance et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Patient and service user engagement in research

    Open Access•Nathan D Shippee, Juan Pablo Domecq Garces et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • Supporting quality public and patient engagement in health system organizations

    Open Access•Julia Abelson, Kathy Li et al.•Health Expectations•2016

  • ‘What difference does it make?’ Finding evidence of the impact of mental health service user researchers on research into the experiences of detained psychiatric patients

    Open Access•Steve Gillard, Steven Gillard et al.•Health Expectations•2010

  • Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute

    Open Access•Lori Frank, Laura Forsythe et al.•Quality of Life Research•2015

  • How Clinical Diagnosis Might Exacerbate the Stigma of Mental Illness

    P W Corrigan•Social Work•2007

  • Patient Perspectives on Strengths and Challenges of Therapist-Assisted Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

    Open Access•Heather D Hadjistavropoulos, Y Nichole Faller et al.•Community Mental Health Journal•2018

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae