Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Risk assessment and clinical decision making for colorectal cancer screening

Bibliographic Data

ID19507728
AuthorsPaul C Schroy (0000-0001-9273-7832, Section of Gastroenterology Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA USA, corresponding author), Sarah E Caron (Women's Health Unit Section of General Internal Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA USA), Bonnie J Sherman (0000-0002-6322-8366, Women's Health Unit Section of General Internal Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA USA), Timothy Heeren (0000-0001-5643-3559, Boston University), Timothy C Heeren (Department of Biostatistics Boston University School of Public Health Boston MA USA), Tracy A Battaglia (0000-0001-8475-1212, Women's Health Unit Section of General Internal Medicine Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA USA)
Year2015
Volume18
Issue5
Pages1327-1338
Publication date2015-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12110
PMID23905546
PMCIDPMC4213312
OpenAlexW2138992364
LanguageEN
References cited45

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) related to test preference has been advocated as a potentially effective strategy for increasing adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, yet primary care providers (PCPs) are often reluctant to comply with patient preferences if they differ from their own. Risk stratification advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) provides a rational strategy for reconciling these differences. OBJECTIVE: To assess the importance of risk stratification in PCP decision making related to test preference for average-risk patients and receptivity to use of an electronic risk assessment tool for ACN to facilitate SDM. DESIGN: Mixed methods, including qualitative key informant interviews and a cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: PCPs at an urban, academic safety-net institution. MAIN MEASURES: Screening preferences, factors influencing patient recommendations and receptivity to use of a risk stratification tool. KEY RESULTS: Nine PCPs participated in interviews and 57 completed the survey. Despite an overwhelming preference for colonoscopy by 95% of respondents, patient risk (67%) and patient preferences (63%) were more influential in their decision making than patient comorbidities (31%; P < 0.001). Age was the single most influential risk factor (excluding family history), with <20% of respondents choosing factors other than age. Most respondents reported that they would be likely to use a risk stratification tool in their practice either 'often' (43%) or sometimes (53%). CONCLUSIONS: Risk stratification was perceived to be important in clinical decision making, yet few providers considered risk factors other than age for average-risk patients. Providers were receptive to the use of a risk assessment tool for ACN when recommending an appropriate screening test for select patients

Cancer · Colonoscopy · Colorectal cancer · Family medicine · Preference · Risk assessment · Risk management tools · Risk perception · Risk Stratification · Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Internal Medicine

  • Basics of qualitative research

    Anselm Strauss, Juliet Corbin et al.•Basics of qualitative research•2008

  • Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks

    Open Access•Isaac M Lipkus, Isaac Lipkus•Medical Decision Making•2007

  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice

    Open Access•France Légaré, Stéphane Ratté et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•2008

  • Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making

    Open Access•Paul C Schroy, Shamini Mylvaganam et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice

    Open Access•Margaret Holmes‐Rovner, Diane Valade et al.•Health Expectations•2000

  • Perceptions of Iowa Family Physicians Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Barcey T Levy, Mrinalini Joshi et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Informed Decision-Making and Colorectal Cancer Screening

    Bruce S Ling, Xuefeng B Ling et al.•Medical Care•2008

  • Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1999

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae