Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anticipating the Future in an Uncertain Present

How Individuals Living With Medically Unexplained Cognitive Complaints Value Biomarker‐Based Prognostics

Bibliographic Data

ID19507764
AuthorsAnne‐Fleur van der Meer (0000-0001-6922-9637, Radboud University Medical Centre, IQ Health, Ethics of Healthcare Group Nijmegen The Netherlands, corresponding author), Marjan Knippenberg (0000-0001-9707-7458, Radboud University Medical Centre, IQ Health, Ethics of Healthcare Group Nijmegen The Netherlands), Denise Visser (0000-0002-3642-146X, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands), Marianne Boenink (0000-0002-7017-0043, Radboud University Medical Centre, IQ Health, Ethics of Healthcare Group Nijmegen The Netherlands)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue3
Pagese70284-e70284
Publication date2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.70284
PMID40411282
OpenAlexW4410715927
LanguageEN
References cited29

INTRODUCTION: In research on Alzheimer's disease (AD) individuals experiencing cognitive problems but not satisfying criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD are referred to as having 'Subjective Cognitive Decline' (SCD). A small subset of them will progress to a state justifying an AD diagnosis. AD research trying to identify prognostic biomarkers aims to inform individuals labelled with SCD about the future development of their complaints. This paper explores how persons experiencing these cognitive complaints currently anticipate the future and how they would value emerging biomarker-based prognostic tests. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 10 individuals experiencing cognitive complaints, some accompanied by their partners. The interviews were coded using ATLAS.ti 22. The exploratory qualitative analysis was conducted using thematic content analysis (TA). FINDINGS: The interviewees experience pervasive uncertainty concerning their persistent but medically unexplained cognitive symptoms. Lacking a diagnosis and a prognosis, they anticipate their future considering various scenarios, while mainly acting upon the scenario of developing further cognitive decline/AD dementia. Interviewees often interpret questions about prognostication as asking about predicting the likelihood of a future diagnosis, clearly valuing the latter. Most interviewees are positive, assuming it would help them and their relatives prepare for the future. They have specific ideas about what type of prognostic information would be helpful, usually focusing on how cognitive decline would impact their lives, for example, what activities they will be able to continue to engage in, when they will no longer recognise loved ones or what character they will have as a patient. CONCLUSION: People experiencing unexplained cognitive complaints experience pervasive uncertainty about their situation and future. They clearly value the idea of a test predicting with high certainty whether they will be diagnosed with AD in the future. Regarding prognostication, most interviewees expect that such tests could help prepare for the future. However, there is a discrepancy between the outcomes usually measured in prognostic research (like the expected speed of decline) and the specific outcomes meaningful to our interviewees. In view of this gap, it is important to reconsider whether and how the development of prognostic biomarker tests for people suffering from unexplained cognitive complaints can be better tailored to the needs of these individuals. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: During our interviews, we gathered the perspectives of 10 individuals suffering from medically unexplained cognitive complaints on the value of biomarker-based prognostics. These interviews were the primary data source. Individuals were also involved in the interpretation of our findings and critical evaluation of our preliminary conclusions

Cognition · Cognitive decline · Dementia · Disease · Pathology · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Thematic analysis · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Medicine · Psychology · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Traumatic Brain Injury Research

  • The Alzheimer Conundrum

    Open Access•Margaret M Lock, Margaret Lock•The Alzheimer Conundrum•2013

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Open Access•Frank Jessen, Rebecca E Amariglio et al.•Alzheimer's & Dementia•2014

  • Anticipated regret and health behavior

    Open Access•Noel T Brewer, Jessica T DeFrank et al.•Health Psychology•2016

  • NIA‐AA Research Framework

    Open Access•Clifford R Jack, David A Bennett et al.•Alzheimer's & Dementia•2018

  • Alzheimer's disease

    Open Access•Philip Scheltens, Bart De Strooper et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • Thematic Analysis

    Open Access•Braun, Victoria Clarke•Encyclopedia of Quality of Life…•2022

  • Anticipation

    Open Access•Vincanne Adams, Michelle Murphy et al.•Subjectivity•2009

  • I just want permission to be ill

    Open Access•Sarah Nettleton•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • Pragmatics of explanation

    Open Access•Marinella Greco, Monica Greco•The Sociological Review•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae