Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does a decision aid for prostate cancer affect different aspects of decisional regret, assessed with new regret scales? A randomized, controlled trial

Bibliographic Data

ID19507813
AuthorsJulia J van Tol‐Geerdink (0000-0002-1692-4262, Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands), Jan Willem H Leer (Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands), Carl J Wijburg (Department of Urology Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem the Netherlands), Carl Wijburg (0000-0002-0627-5377, Rijnstate Hospital), Inge M van Oort (0000-0002-8002-1869, Department of Urology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands), Henk Vergunst (Department of Urology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen the Netherlands), Emile J van Lin (Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands), J Alfred Witjes (0000-0003-0059-3857, Department of Urology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands), Peep F M Stalmeier (0000-0002-7553-562X, Department of Health Evidence Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen the Netherlands)
Year2016
Volume19
Issue2
Pages459-470
Publication date2016-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12369
PMID25940277
OpenAlexW2017517087
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited35

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate new regret scales and examine whether a decision aid affects different aspects of regret in the treatment choice for prostate cancer. METHODS: This was a multicentre trial (three sites) with imbalanced randomization (1 : 2). From 2008 to 2011, patients with localized prostate cancer were randomized 1 : 2 to usual care (N = 77) or usual care plus a decision aid presenting risks and benefits of different treatments (N = 163). The treatments were surgery and (external or interstitial) radiotherapy. Regret was assessed before, and 6 and 12 months after treatment, using the Decisional regret scale by Brehaut et al. (Medical Decision Making, 23, 2003, 281), and three new scales focusing on process, option and outcome regret. The relation between decision aid and regret was analysed by anova. RESULTS: The concurrent validity of the new regret scales was confirmed by correlations between regret and anxiety, depression, decision evaluation scales and health-related quality of life. With a decision aid, patient participation was increased (P = 0.002), but regret was not. If anything, in patients with serious morbidity the decision aid resulted in a trend to less option regret and less Brehaut regret (P = 0.075 and P = 0.061, with effect sizes of 0.35 and 0.38, respectively). Exploratory analyses suggest that high-risk patients benefitted most from the decision aid. CONCLUSION: The new regret scales may be of value in distinguishing separate aspects of regret. In general, regret was not affected by the decision aid. In patients with serious morbidity, a trend to lower option regret with a decision aid was observed

Anxiety · Cancer · Prostate cancer · Psychiatry · Randomized controlled trial · Regret · Statistics · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Medicine · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Internal Medicine · Surgery

  • An Adaptation, Extension and Pre-Testing of an Interactive Decision Aid for Men Diagnosed with Localized Prostate Cancer in Iceland

    Valgerdur Kristin Eiriksdottir, Þórdís Jónsdóttir et al.•Behavioral Medicine•2021

  • Assessing decision regret in caregivers of deceased German people with cancer—A psychometric validation of the Decision Regret Scale for Caregivers

    Open Access•Markus W Haun, Alexander Schakowski et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale

    Open Access•Annette M O’Connor, Annette M O'Connor•Medical Decision Making•1995

  • Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn•BMJ•2006

  • Depression and Quality of Life in Older Persons

    Open Access•Heidi Sivertsen, Guro Hanevold Bjørkløf et al.•Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive…•2015

  • Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice

    Open Access•France Légaré, Stéphane Ratté et al.•Patient Education and Counseling•2008

  • Regret in Decision Making

    Open Access•Terry Connolly, Marcel Zeelenberg•Current Directions in Psychological…•2002

  • The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Open Access•A S Zigmond, R P Snaith•Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica•1983

  • On the suitability of fast and frugal heuristics for designing values clarification methods in patient decision aids

    Open Access•Arwen H Pieterse, Marieke De Vries•Health Expectations•2013

  • Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life

    Geoffrey R Norman, Jeff A Sloan et al.•Medical Care•2003

  • Measuring Patientsʼ Perceptions of the Outcomes of Treatment for Early Prostate Cancer

    Jack A Clark, Barbara G Bokhour et al.•Medical Care•2003

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2019 - 2021 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae