Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

‘The Norm Is to Not Openly Collaborate’

Using the Lens of Co‐Production to Evaluate the Development of a Covid‐19 ICU Triage Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID19507941
AuthorsBrett Scholz (0000-0003-2819-994X, School of Medicine and Psychology The Australian National University Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia, corresponding author), Flick Grey (Affiliated along my own idiosyncratic lines Wurundjeri Country Melbourne Victoria Australia), Joyce Graham (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Liaison Service Canberra Health Services Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia), Graham Joyce (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies), Imogen Mitchell (0000-0001-6013-4922, School of Medicine and Psychology The Australian National University Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia), Lucy Kirk (0000-0003-3462-3890, School of Medicine and Psychology The Australian National University Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia), Terri Warner (0000-0001-9345-8907, School of Medicine and Psychology The Australian National University Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia)
Year2024
Volume27
Issue4
Pagese14159-e14159
Publication date2024-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.14159
PMID39072847
OpenAlexW4401045705
LanguageEN
References cited24

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, surging cases of COVID-19 meant that health services had to plan for crisis-level triage. In the Australian Capital Territory, the Clinical Health Emergency Coordination Centre sought to develop a triage policy in collaboration with a range of consumer, carer and community groups. This study aims to map the collaborative development of the COVID-19 ICU triage policy onto the principles of co-production. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with facilitators, members of advocacy or consumer groups and clinicians who were involved in the development of the triage policy. Interviews were thematically analysed using both theory- and data-driven approaches to, respectively, draw on the theoretical framework of co-production, and to explore participants' perspectives relevant to but beyond the scope of this theoretical framework. RESULTS: The findings suggest that at each stage of the initiative, there were ways in which the principles of co-production were met, and ways in which they were not met. One of the fundamental concerns that arose was about whether trying to solve a problem based on resources was compatible with a solution based on human rights. CONCLUSION: Literature about co-production has been critiqued for being limited to aspirational concerns, or implying co-production is easily achievable. The current study contributes to existing research through the application of the theoretical framework of co-production and exploring ways its aims were met and not met within a system-level collaboration developing a high-stakes health policy. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study has been conducted and written by researchers working from lived experience perspectives, and other researchers working from traditionally mainstream health disciplines, including psychology and medicine. Further, the study is about patient and public involvement in the development of a health policy. Thus it both embodies and is about non-tokenistic collaboration between people with lived experience and other health professionals

Business · Economics · Medical emergency · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Triage · Computer Science · Disaster Response and Management · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Psychology

  • Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences

    Robert A Stebbins, Robert Stebbins•Exploratory Research in the…•2001

  • Allocation of scarce resources in Africa during Covid‐19

    Open Access•Keymanthri Moodley, Rennie et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2021

  • The politics of co-production

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Tamara Metze et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • The third sphere

    Chloë Dierckx, Lynn Hendricks et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2020

  • Ageism in the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Jon Rueda Etxeberria•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2021

  • Co‐Production and Health System Reform – From Re‐Imagining To Re‐Making

    Open Access•Roger Dunston, Alison Lee et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2009

  • Communication for Coproduction

    Open Access•Huafang Li•The American Review of Public…•2020

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Highly citedNo
Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae