Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Dilemmas and Opportunities of Co‐Creating Health Interventions to Fit Local Contexts

An Ethnographic Study on the Adaptation of Clinical Guidelines in Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID19508015
AuthorsHaika Osaki (0000-0001-6119-7079, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark, corresponding author), Morten Skovdal (0000-0002-2068-1814, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark), Jane Brandt Sørensen (0000-0002-1702-280X, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark), Nanna Maaløe (0000-0002-3443-1277, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark), Natasha Housseine (0000-0002-1849-7815, Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark), Brenda Sequeira Dmello (Department of Public Health University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark), Brenda Sequeira D’mello (0000-0002-1550-248X, University of Copenhagen), Columba Mbekenga (0000-0002-3322-4057, School of Nursing Kairuki University Dar es Salaam Tanzania)
Year2024
Volume27
Issue5
Pagese70073-e70073
Publication date2024-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.70073
PMID39445810
OpenAlexW4403705327
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited34

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare providers' role in co-creating health interventions and implementation strategies has evolved significantly, and yet, there is little documentation of this from low-resource settings. This study aims to share the dilemmas of engaging healthcare providers in co-creating locally adapted clinical guidelines for maternity facilities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and strategies used to address them. METHODS: An ethnographic study explored the co-creation of locally adapted clinical guidelines for childbirth care within five maternity facilities in Dar es Salaam. Participant observations were conducted during 11 co-creation workshops. Six in-depth interviews explored participant experiences. Data were analyzed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network analysis framework. RESULTS: The analysis revealed four themes representing dilemmas in the co-creation process and strategies to improve co-creation: (i) navigating diverse contexts: adapting a single set of guidelines to various, diverse facilities was challenging; this was addressed through engaging in dialogue and flexibility while adjusting care practices. (ii) Competing knowledge systems and sources: differing knowledge sources between researchers and healthcare providers challenged discussions on recommended practices. However, validating scientific recommendations with practical care experience in this context helped bridge this gap. (iii) Fostering meaningful participation: participation was time-consuming for some. However, early stakeholder engagement and facility-led participant selection facilitated the meaningful involvement of healthcare providers. (iv) Power imbalances: power dynamics influenced the co-creation process; involving stakeholders in planning and co-facilitating workshops helped mitigate these imbalances and encourage more equal participation. CONCLUSION: Navigating contextual variation, differences in knowledge systems, meaningful participation and power dynamics were key challenges in the co-creation process. However, reflexivity, open and honest dialogue with stakeholders and early engagement enhanced the co-creation process. Co-creating locally adapted clinical guidelines with frontline healthcare workers and scientific experts is essential for feasibility and safety. Further research is needed to explore context specificity, decision-making and the efficacy of co-creation in low-resource settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Healthcare providers and health managers from five maternity facilities who participated in the co-creation process were actively involved in this study by providing their consent to be interviewed about their experiences of participation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a substudy within the PartoMa project. PartoMa is a registered clinical trial with the trial registration number NCT04685668. PartoMa's date of initial trial registration is 28 December 2020

Ethnography · Geography · Psychological intervention · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Tanzania · Anthropology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Health Policy Implementation Science · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • ‘One woman, one bed’

    Open Access•Brenda Sequeira D’mello, Natasha Housseine et al.•Global Health Action•2025

  • The PROMISE study

    Open Access•Monica Lauridsen Kujabi, Farduus Mohamed et al.•Global Health Action•2026

  • Collective coping work among healthcare providers navigating the precarities of an overburdened maternity facility in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Open Access•Haika Osaki, Columba Mbekenga et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Examining the “Urban Advantage” in Maternal Health Care in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Zoë Matthews, Amos Channon et al.•PLoS Medicine•2010

  • Co-creation, co-design, co-production for public health – a perspective on definitions and distinctions

    Open Access•Carmen Vargas, Jill Whelan et al.•Public Health Research & Practice•2022

  • Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement

    Open Access•Hilary Pinnock, Melanie Barwick et al.•BMJ•2017

  • Qualitative research methodologies

    Open Access•Scott Reeve, S Reeves et al.•BMJ•2008

  • Opening the black box

    Karina Nielsen, Raymond Randall•European Journal of Work and…•2013

  • Balancing power in co-production

    Open Access•Caroline Ärleskog, Nicoline Vackerberg et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • A growing disadvantage of being born in an urban area? Analysing urban–rural disparities in neonatal mortality in 21 African countries with a focus on Tanzania

    Open Access•Megan Norris, G Klabbers et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  • Maternal and newborn health for the urban poor

    Open Access•Shanon McNab, Elaine Scudder et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

  • Scaling up context-tailored clinical guidelines and training to improve childbirth care in urban, low-resource maternity units in Tanzania

    Open Access•Nanna Maaløe, Natasha Housseine et al.•Global Health Action•2022

  • Scaling up Locally Adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for Improving Childbirth Care in Tanzania

    Open Access•Jane Brandt Sørensen, Natasha Housseine et al.•Global Health Action•2022

  • A qualitative evaluation of coproduction of research

    Open Access•Joanne Worsley, Mick Mckeown et al.•Health Expectations•2022

  • Examining the links between community participation and health outcomes

    Open Access•Susan Beth Rifkin•Health Policy and Planning•2014

  • Chasing the dragon

    Open Access•Alan Draper, Alizon Katharine Draper et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • Thematic networks

    Open Access•Jennifer Attride-Stirling, Jennifer Attride‐Stirling•Qualitative Research•2001

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae