Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lung cancer screening

What do long‐term smokers know and believe

Bibliographic Data

ID19508089
AuthorsLisa Carter‐harri (0000-0002-6448-6033, Indiana University School of Nursing Indianapolis IN USA, corresponding author), Duykhanh P Ceppa (0000-0002-2201-4206, Indiana University School of Medicine), Nasser Hanna (Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA), Nasser H Hanna (0000-0002-7046-6426, Indiana University Health), Susan M Rawl (0000-0003-2052-2853, Indiana University School of Nursing Indianapolis IN USA)
Year2017
Volume20
Issue1
Pages59-68
Publication date2017-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12433
PMID26701339
OpenAlexW2218791498
LanguageEN
Citations received22
References cited21

OBJECTIVE: To explore knowledge and beliefs of long-term smokers about lung cancer, associated risk factors and lung cancer screening. DESIGN: Qualitative study theoretically framed by the expanded Health Belief Model based on four focus group discussions. Content analysis was performed to identify themes of knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer, associated risk factors and lung cancer screening among long-term smokers' who had and had not been screened for lung cancer. METHODS: Twenty-six long-term smokers were recruited; two groups (n = 9; n = 3) had recently been screened and two groups (n = 7; n = 7) had never been screened. RESULTS: While most agreed lung cancer is deadly, confusion or inaccurate information exists regarding the causes and associated risk factors. Knowledge related to lung cancer screening and how it is performed was low; awareness of long-term smoking's association with lung cancer risk remains suboptimal. Perceived benefits of screening identified include: (i) finding lung cancer early; (ii) giving peace of mind; and (iii) motivation to quit smoking. Perceived barriers to screening identified include: (i) inconvenience; (ii) distrust; and (iii) stigma. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived barriers to lung cancer screening, such as distrust and stigma, must be addressed as lung cancer screening becomes more widely implemented. Heightened levels of health-care system distrust may impact successful implementation of screening programmes. Perceived smoking-related stigma may lead to low levels of patient engagement with medical care and decreased cancer screening participation. It is also important to determine modifiable targets for intervention to enhance the shared decision-making process between health-care providers and their high-risk patients

Cancer · Cancer screening · Distrust · Family medicine · Focus group · Lung cancer · Lung cancer screening · Pathology · Psychotherapist · Qualitative research · Smoking cessation · Global Cancer Incidence and Screening · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations · Medicine · Psychology · Internal Medicine · Oncology

  • Lung cancer screening and stigma

    Open Access•Timothy J Williamson, Susan M Rawl et al.•Stigma and Health•2021

  • Perceptions and feelings of a French sample regarding lung cancer screening

    Open Access•Nicolas Darnaud, Jean-Eudes Mory et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • A community-based approach to address lung cancer screening disparities in the black community using the Witness Project® framework

    Open Access•Lisa Carter‐harri, Jamie S Ostroff et al.•BMC Public Health•2025

  • Leveraging social media to increase lung cancer screening awareness, knowledge and uptake among high-risk populations (The INSPIRE-Lung Study)

    Open Access•Lisa Carter-Bawa, Lisa Carter‐harri et al.•BMC Public Health•2023

  • Determinants of motivation to quit in smokers screened for the early detection of lung cancer

    Open Access•in collaboration with the ECLS study team, Ben Young et al.•BMC Public Health•2018

  • A qualitative analysis of smokers’ perceptions about lung cancer screening

    Open Access•Lindsay Gressard, Amy DeGroff et al.•BMC Public Health•2017

  • Increasing uptake to a lung cancer screening programme

    Open Access•Lynsey Rachael Brown, Frank Sullivan et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • LDCT uptake and determinants of lung cancer screening in Asia

    Open Access•Yue Hu, Yuntong Zhao et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Emotions and lung cancer screening

    Open Access•Rebecca Olson, Lisa B Goldsmith et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2022

  • Barriers to and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening Among Latino and Non-Latino Current and Former Smokers

    Open Access•Sanja Percac-Lima, Jeffrey M Ashburner et al.•Journal of Immigrant and Minority…•2019

  • Optimizing the implementation of lung cancer screening in Scotland

    Open Access•Debbie Cavers, Mia Nelson et al.•Health Expectations•2022

  • Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in socioeconomically deprived and heavy smoking communities

    Open Access•Samantha L Quaife, Laura A V Marlow et al.•Health Expectations•2017

  • Attitudes towards the integration of smoking cessation into lung cancer screening in the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Samantha Groves, Grace McCutchan et al.•Health Expectations•2022

  • Attitudes towards lung cancer screening in a population sample

    Open Access•Stephanie Smits, Grace McCutchan et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • “To know or not to know…?” Push and pull in ever smokers lung screening uptake decision‐making intentions

    Open Access•Janet E Tonge, Melanie Atack et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • Understanding the decision to screen for lung cancer or not

    Open Access•Claire Draucker, Susan M Rawl et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • Developing and testing a brief clinic‐based lung cancer screening decision aid for primary care settings

    Open Access•Karen Kane McDonnell, Scott M Strayer et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Surprise Reveals the Affective-Moral Economies in Cancer Illness Narratives

    Open Access•Plage, Rebecca Olson•Qualitative Health Research•2021

  • Racism, discrimination, medical mistrust, stigma, and lung cancer screening

    Sreekar Miriyala, Kirsten V Nguyen et al.•Ethnicity and Health•2025

  • Individuals Eligible for Lung Cancer Screening Less Likely to Receive Screening When Enrolled in Health Plans With Deductibles

    Kris Wain, Nikki M Carroll et al.•Medical Care•2023

  • The Impact of Medicare Health Insurance Coverage on Lung Cancer Screening

    Open Access•Jiren Sun, Marcelo Coca Perraillon et al.•Medical Care•2022

  • Imperatives of health or happiness

    Open Access•Rebecca Olson, Xuan Wen Ek et al.•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2023

  • The Content Analysis Guidebook

    Kimberly A Neuendorf•The Content Analysis Guidebook•2017

  • Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening

    The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team•New England Journal of Medicine•2011

  • Self-efficacy

    Open Access•Albert Bandura•Advances in Behaviour Research…•1978

  • Self-efficacy

    Albert Bandura•Psychological Review•1977

  • Smokers’ unrealistic optimism about their risk

    N D Weinstein, S E Marcus et al.•Tobacco Control•2005

Unique citing works22
Citations per year2,44
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae