Depressed patients’ perceptions of depression treatment decision‐making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19508253 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniela Simón (0009-0000-8752-9123, University of Freiburg), Andreas Loh (University of Freiburg), Celia E Wills (0000-0001-8548-1517, University of Freiburg), Martin Härter (0000-0001-7443-9890, University of Freiburg) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 62-74 |
| Publication date | 2007-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00424.x |
| PMID | 17324195 |
| OpenAlex | W1776882322 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 38 |
Objective Little is known about the feasibility and effects of patient‐clinician shared decision‐making (SDM) for depression treatment. Within a goal of informing the design of a SDM intervention, the objective of this study was to investigate depressed patients’ perceptions of the treatment decision‐making process with general practitioners (GPs). Setting and participants Data were gathered from a convenience sample of 40 depressed patients to understand key aspects of treatment decision‐making from the patient perspective. The sample varied in depression severity and type of setting in which treatment was sought. Main variables studied Semi‐structured interview questions focused on patients’ prior experiences with depression and treatment, perceptions of the treatment decision‐making process, and needs and expectations about treatment. Current depression severity was also assessed. Results Patient lack of insight regarding depression severity substantially delayed patient engagement in treatment seeking and decision‐making. Patients expected their GPs to be a first and main source of objective information and discussion about depression and treatment and to provide emotional support for decision‐making. Patients also identified needs for additional information about depression and its treatment, as well as concerns about certain aspects of treatment. Conclusions The depression treatment context has some aspects that differ from treatment decision‐making for other types of health conditions. SDM approaches for depression treatment should be adapted based on depression severity and patient‐identified needs
Perception · Psychiatry · Clinical Psychology · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology
Knowledge is not power for patients
Primary Care Professional’s Perspectives on Treatment Decision Making for Depression with African Americans and Latinos in Primary Care Practice
Patients' perspective on self‐management in the recovery from depression
Information and decision‐making needs among people with mental disorders
A Qualitative Exploration of Clinician Views and Experiences of Treatment Decision-Making in Bipolar II Disorder
Discourses of Influence and Autonomy in Physicians' Accounts of Treatment Decision Making for Depression
A Model of Empathic Communication in the Medical Interview
Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality
Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians? diagnoses
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions
Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression
An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters
“Mental health literacy”
Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MD The PHQ Primary Care Study
Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision‐making in the consultation
Primary Care Patients’ Involvement in Decision-Making Is Associated With Improvement in Depression
Assessing the Effects of Physician-Patient Interactions on the Outcomes of Chronic Disease
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter
Stigma revisited, disclosure of emotional problems in primary care consultations in Wales
Patient participation in decision-making
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,43 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2017 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |