Swallowing the pill of adverse effects
A qualitative study of patients' and pharmacists' experiences and decision‐making regarding the adverse effects of chronic pain medications
Datos Bibliográficos
INTRODUCTION: Pharmacological treatments of chronic pain can lead to numerous and sometimes serious adverse effects. Drawing on a social science approach to chronic illness, this study aimed to understand the experiences of people living with chronic pain and community pharmacists regarding the definition, prevention and management of analgesic adverse effects. METHODS: This qualitative study proceeded through 12 online focus groups (FGs) with people living with chronic pain (n = 26) and community pharmacists (n = 19), conducted between July 2020 and February 2021 in the province of Quebec, Canada. The semistructured discussion guides covered participants' definitions of adverse effects and decision-making regarding their prevention and management. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Both people with chronic pain and pharmacists provided varying definitions of analgesic adverse effects depending on patients' social and clinical characteristics. Present quality of life and serious long-term risks related to treatment were described as key dimensions influencing adverse effect appraisal. Dilemmas and discrepancies occurred between patients and pharmacists when choosing to prioritize pain relief or adverse effect prevention. Some patients lacked information about their medications and wanted to be more involved in decisions, while many pharmacists were concerned by patients' self-management of adverse effects. Preventing opioid-related overdoses often led pharmacists to policing practices. Despite most pharmacists wishing they could have a key role in the management of pain and adverse effects face organizational and financial barriers. CONCLUSION: Defining, preventing and managing adverse effects in the treatment of chronic pain requires a person-centred approach and shared decision-making. Clinical training improvements and healthcare organization changes are needed to support pharmacists in providing patients with community-based follow-up and reliable information about the adverse effects of chronic pain treatments. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A person with lived experience of chronic pain was involved as a coinvestigator in the study. He contributed to shaping the study design and objectives, including major methodological decisions such as the choice of pharmacists as the most appropriate professionals to investigate. In addition, 26 individuals with chronic pain shared their experiences extensively during the FGs
Adverse effect · Analgesic · Chronic pain · Family medicine · Focus group · Grounded theory · Intensive care medicine · Medical prescription · Pill · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Medicine · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Nursing · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Pain Management and Opioid Use · Pharmacology
Basic and Advanced Focus Groups
A Contribution to the Philosophy of medicine
Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults — United States, 2016
Chronic Illness and the Quality of Life
Swallowing the pill of adverse effects
Living with opioids
Gaining Autonomy & Medication Management (GAM)
Lessons Learned Using Web Conference Technology for Online Focus Group Interviews
Like being put on an ice floe and shoved away”
Chronic pain management among people who use drugs
Qualitative research on chronic illness
Impact of chronic pain on health care seeking, self care, and medication. Results from a population-based Swedish study
Opioid pharmacovigilance
Pain
Just Advil
Conversations About Opioids
A critical content analysis of media reporting on opioids
There are always two sides to these things
The meaning of medications
The collaborative management of antipsychotic medication and its obstacles
An anthropology of lying
The illness experience
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 4 |