Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer

How might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19508441
AutoresStephanie Sivell (0000-0003-0253-1860, Cardiff University), Adrian Edwards (0000-0001-7432-2828, IS practice), Glyn Elwyn (0000-0002-0917-6286, Cardiff University), Antony Manstead (0000-0001-7540-2096, Cardiff University), Antony S R Manstead
Ano2011
Volume14
Fascículos1
Páginas6-19
Data de publicação2011-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00558.x
PMID20579123
OpenAlexW2101239203
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas3
Referências citadas80

Objective To describe the evidence about factors influencing breast cancer patients’ surgery choices and the implications for designing decision support in reference to an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and the Common Sense Model of Illness Representations (CSM). Background A wide range of factors are known to influence the surgery choices of women diagnosed with early breast cancer facing the choice of mastectomy or breast conservation surgery with radiotherapy. However, research does not always reflect the complexities of decision making and is often atheoretical. A theoretical approach, as provided by the CSM and the TPB, could help to identify and tailor support by focusing on patients’ representations of their breast cancer and predicting surgery choices. Design Literature search and narrative synthesis of data. Synthesis Twenty‐six studies reported women’s surgery choices to be influenced by perceived clinical outcomes of surgery, appearance and body image, treatment concerns, involvement in decision making and preferences of clinicians. These factors can be mapped onto the key constructs of both the TPB and CSM and used to inform the design and development of decision support interventions to ensure accurate information is provided in areas most important to patients. Conclusions The TPB and CSM have the potential to inform the design of decision support for breast cancer patients, with accurate and clear information that avoids leading patients to make decisions they may come to regret. Further research is needed examining how the components of the extended TPB and CSM account for patients’ surgery choices

Breast cancer · Cancer · Mastectomy · Psychological intervention · Regret · Theory of planned behavior · BRCA gene mutations in cancer · Cancer survivorship and care · Computer Science · Medicine · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology

  • Shared Decision Making

    Open Access•Michael J Barry, Michael Barry et al.•Health Expectations•2011

  • Beyond the wounds

    Hyunji Doh, Donnalyn Pompper•Social Semiotics•2015

  • Predicting intention to participate in self-management behaviors in patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia

    Open Access•Martin S Hagger, Kyra Hamilton et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Some problems with social cognition models

    Jane Ogden•Health Psychology•2003

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

    Dawn Stacey, France Légaré et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2017

  • Acting on intentions

    Open Access•Charles Abraham, Paschal Sheeran•British Journal of Social…•2003

  • Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn•BMJ•2006

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of the Common-Sense Model of Illness Representations

    Martin S Hagger, Sheina Orbell•Psychology & Health•2003

  • The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)

    Rona Moss-Morris, Rona Moss‐morri et al.•Psychology & Health•2002

  • A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0

    Open Access•Marcel Zeelenberg, Rik Pieters•Journal of Consumer Psychology•2007

  • Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making.

    G Loewenstein•Health Psychology•2005

  • From Intentions to Actions

    Icek Ajzen•Action Control•1985

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • Perceived Behavioral Control, Self‐Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Journal of Applied Social…•2002

  • Decision Making--A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment

    Larry Elowitz, Irving L Janis et al.•Military Affairs•1978

  • Building on the best – choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS

    Open Access•Zoë Lawrence•Health Expectations•2004

  • Concern About Aspects of Body Image and Adjustment to Early Stage Breast Cancer

    Charles S Carver, Christina Pozo-Kaderman et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•1998

  • Discussion of Treatment Options for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

    Nancy L Keating, Jane C Weeks et al.•Medical Care•2001

  • Some Tests of the Distinction between Cognitive and Affective Beliefs

    Open Access•David Trafimow, Paschal Sheeran•Journal of Experimental Social…•1998

  • The theory of decision making

    Ward Edwards•Psychological Bulletin•1954

Obras citantes distintas3
Citações por ano0,2
Intervalo de citações2011 - 2019 (9)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae