What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor‐patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics

Bibliographic Data

ID19508522
AuthorsSarah Allen (0000-0003-0274-4137, Department of Health Services Research Institute of Population Health Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK, corresponding author), S N Rogers (0000-0002-5989-6142, University of Liverpool), Stephen L Brown (0000-0002-6142-0995, Department of Psychological Sciences Institute of Population Health Sciences Liverpool UK), Rebecca Harris (0000-0002-5891-6826, Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust), Rebecca V Harris (Department of Health Services Research Institute of Population Health Sciences Liverpool UK)
Year2021
Volume24
Issue1
Pages140-151
Publication date2021-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.13163
PMID33227177
OpenAlexW3108046569
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited39

OBJECTIVE: To explore socioeconomic status (SES) differences in patterns of doctor-patient communication within head and neck cancer clinics and why such differences exist. METHODS: Thirty-six head and neck cancer review appointments with five Physicians were observed and audio-taped, along with follow-up interviews involving 32 patients. Data were analysed using Thematic Analysis, and compared by patient SES (education, occupation and Indices of Multiple Deprivation). RESULTS: Three main themes were identified: (a) Physicians used more humour and small talk in their consultations with high SES patients; (b) Low SES patients were more passive in their participation, engaged in less agenda setting and information-seeking, and framed their clinical experience differently; (c) Low SES patients had different preferences for involvement, defining involvement differently to high SES patients and were seen to take a more stoical approach. CONCLUSION: Low SES patients take a more passive role in medical consultations, engage in less relational talk and are less likely to raise concerns, but were satisfied with this. Physicians may adapt their communication behaviour in response to low SES patients' expectations and preferences. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A question prompt list may help low SES patients to raise concerns during their consultations. This may reduce inequalities in communication and health

Cancer · Family medicine · Head and neck · Head and neck cancer · Inequality · Population · Qualitative research · Socioeconomic status · Thematic analysis · Cancer survivorship and care · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology · Internal Medicine · Surgery