Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceptions and Experiences of a Multimodal Rehabilitation Program for People With Post‐Acute Covid‐19

A Qualitative Study

Bibliographic Data

ID19508535
AuthorsBeatriz Carpallo‐Porcar (0000-0003-3039-6539, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences Universidad San Jorge Zaragoza Spain), Sandra Calvo (0000-0002-1674-7788, IIS Aragon Zaragoza Spain, corresponding author), Sara Pérez‐Palomares (0000-0002-5770-5146, IIS Aragon Zaragoza Spain), Laura Blázquez‐Pérez (Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Zaragoza Zaragoza Spain), Natalia Brandín‐de la Cruz (0000-0002-9426-1257, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences Universidad San Jorge Zaragoza Spain), Carolina Jiménez‐Sánchez (0000-0003-2889-2226, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences Universidad San Jorge Zaragoza Spain)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue3
Pagese70283-e70283
Publication date2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.70283
PMID40302157
OpenAlexW4409978533
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited67

INTRODUCTION: Home‐based rehabilitation has emerged as a practical solution for post‐acute phase COVID‐19 recovery, but patient perspectives on the different modalities remain underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To explore participants' perceptions and experiences after a 12‐week multimodal rehabilitation program delivered via asynchronous telerehabilitation versus a booklet after discharge and to identify the preferred format. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study with two face‐to-face focus groups of post-discharge COVID-19 patients (n = 12; age range 41-75 years; 50% female; with fatigue > 4 on the Fatigue Severity Scale) that included participants from each intervention arm of a randomised pilot study. Semi‐structured interviews to determine patients' perceptions and experiences were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded independently by two researchers using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Facilitators for engagement and adherence: Innovative digital tools and personalised guidance foster active participation by providing flexible access and systematic progress monitoring; (2) Barriers to sustained participation: Technological issues, physical limitations and fluctuating motivation serve as critical impediments, underscoring the potential benefits of hybrid intervention models; and (3) Therapeutic alliance as support: A robust, individualised therapeutic relationship enhances patient confidence and self-management, ultimately contributing to sustained empowerment and recovery. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal home-based rehabilitation program with monitoring and personalisation by the physiotherapist is rated positively by post-acute COVID-19 patients, with asynchronous telerehabilitation emerging as the preferred method. Future research should investigate long‐term adherence, clinical efficacy and scalability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinialtrials.gov #NCT04794036. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Post-acute COVID-19 patients contributed to the study by actively participating in its development, specifically through describing their experiences as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program. There was no additional participation or contribution from the public to the research

Empowerment · Focus group · Health care · Modalities · Physical therapy · Qualitative research · Telehealth · Telemedicine · Telerehabilitation · Thematic analysis · Applied Psychology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Rehabilitation

  • Long Covid Optimal Health Programme to Enhance Mental and Physical Health

    Open Access•Hiyam Al‐Jabr, David Castle et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research

    Open Access•Rosaline S Barbour•BMJ•2001

  • Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (Coreq)

    A Jaure, A Tong et al.•International Journal for Quality…•2007

  • Telemedicine as the New Outpatient Clinic Gone Digital

    Open Access•Sonu Bhaskar, Sian Bradley et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2020

  • Saturation in qualitative research

    Open Access•Benjamin Saunders, Joe Sims et al.•Quality & Quantity•2017

  • Experiences of people with Long Covid with a digital physiotherapy intervention

    Open Access•María‐José Estebanez‐Pérez, Rocío Martín‐Valero et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Perspectives and Attitudes of Patients with Covid-19 toward a Telerehabilitation Programme

    Open Access•Carlos Bernal‐Utrera, Ernesto Anarte‐Lazo et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • Qualitative inquiry and research design

    John W Creswell•Qualitative inquiry and research…•2013

  • Benefits of Home-Based Exercise Training Following Critical Sars-CoV-2 Infection

    Open Access•Igor Longobardi, Danilo Marcelo Leite Do Prado et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2022

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae