Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

‘ It Is Like a Cross‐Stitch … All Joined Together But Not Making a Very Nice Pattern’

A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on Physical Health Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness

Bibliographic Data

ID19508683
AuthorsTassia K Oswald (0000-0002-1686-7077, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK), Constantina Papoulias (0000-0002-7891-0923, King's College London), Stan Papoulias (Service User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK), Julie Williams (0000-0002-8861-0596, Centre for Mental Health Policy and Evaluation, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK), Jayati Das-Munshi (0000-0002-3913-6859, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience King's College London London UK, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume28
Issue4
Pagese70367-e70367
Publication date2025-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.70367
PMID40767858
OpenAlexW4413021098
LanguageEN
References cited34

BACKGROUND: People with severe mental illness (SMI) have worse physical health than the general population and face a range of challenges with their healthcare. This study aimed to explore the interplay of issues across system, service, social and individual levels that impact healthcare experiences and outcomes from the perspective of people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted. Fifteen individuals participated through focus groups and interviews (mean age = 55 years; range = 39-74 years). Participants were secondary mental health service users living with comorbid SMI and physical health condition(s) in South East London, the United Kingdom. Data were analysed through a process of inductive thematic analysis with reflexive elements. RESULTS: Seven themes were generated, demonstrating the interplay of system, service, social and individual-level issues. The first two focused on prevailing issues described by participants, including 'systemic barriers to effective and equitable social and health care' and 'interpersonal stigma exacerbating inequalities'. The third and fourth themes described the consequences of these issues: 'services turning to medication in response to multiple constraints' and 'inequities limiting individual actions'. Themes 5 and 6 centred on creating equitable conditions for people with SMI and physical healthcare needs, including 'the role of informal and formal social supports' and 'patient perspectives on what works in health services'. The seventh cross-cutting theme described the 'intertwined nature of mental and physical health'. IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights systemic barriers and interpersonal stigma as sources of inequality for people with comorbid SMI and physical health needs. The findings highlight the need for investment in social and healthcare roles, services and systems which can be responsive to compounding risks experienced by these individuals. Both physical and mental health needs, and their interactions, should be considered, along with the cumulative impact of poor socio-economic conditions and stressors. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A service user steering group, comprising five people with lived experience of SMI, was convened to support the study. The group met to inform the development of research questions, topic guides and participant materials, support the interpretation of findings, and provide input on the paper

Health care · Mental health · Mental illness · Political science · Population · Psychiatry · Qualitative research · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Nursing · Psychology · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Gerontology

  • Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit

    Open Access•Sophie Wickham, Lee Bentley et al.•The Lancet Public Health•2020

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission

    Open Access•Joseph Firth, Noreen Siddiqi et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2019

  • Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care

    Open Access•Marc De Hert, Christoph U Correll et al.•World Psychiatry•2011

  • Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders

    Open Access•Nancy H Liu, Gail L Daumit et al.•World Psychiatry•2017

  • Years of potential life lost and life expectancy in schizophrenia

    Open Access•Carsten Hjorthøj, Anne Emilie Stürup et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2017

  • Syndemic contexts

    Open Access•Irene Pirrone, Marjolein Dieleman et al.•Global Health Action•2021

  • Can we better understand severe mental illness through the lens of Syndemics

    Open Access•Silke Vereeken, Emily Peckham et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2023

  • Living less safely through the pandemic in England for people with serious mental and physical health conditions

    Open Access•Josephine Ocloo, Ruth Stuart et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Work, welfare, and wellbeing

    Open Access•Peter Dwyer, Lisa Scullion et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2020

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae