Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Decision aid use during post‐biopsy consultations for localized prostate cancer

Bibliographic Data

ID19508744
AuthorsMargaret Holmes‐Rovner (0000-0002-8725-7938, Centre for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA, corresponding author), Akshay Srikanth (Henry Ford Hospital Wayne State University Detroit MI USA), Stephen G Henry (0000-0002-5643-0881, Division of General Medicine Geriatrics, and Bioethics University of California Davis Sacramento CI USA), Aisha T Langford (0000-0003-1758-691X, Population Council), Aisha Langford (Department of Population Health New York University School of Medicine New York City NY USA), David R Rovner (Department of Medicine Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA), Angela Fagerlin (0000-0002-9192-2777, VA Ann Arbor Centre for Clinical Management Research Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Psychology University of Michigan Ann Arbor MI USA)
Year2018
Volume21
Issue1
Pages279-287
Publication date2018-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12613
PMID28881105
OpenAlexW2753864897
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

BACKGROUND: Decision Aids (DAs) effectively translate medical evidence for patients but are not routinely used in clinical practice. Little is known about how DAs are used during patient-clinician encounters. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the content and communicative function of high-quality DAs during diagnostic clinic visits for prostate cancer. PARTICIPANTS: 252 men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who had received a DA, 45 treating physicians at 4 US Veterans Administration urology clinics. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of transcribed audio recordings was used to inductively develop categories capturing content and function of all direct references to DAs (booklet talk). The presence or absence of any booklet talk per transcript was also calculated. RESULTS: Booklet talk occurred in 55% of transcripts. Content focused on surgical procedures (36%); treatment choice (22%); and clarifying risk classification (17%). Codes reflected the absence of DA use for shared decision-making. In regression analysis, predictors of booklet talk were fewer years of patient education (P = .027) and more time in the encounter (P = .027). Patient race, DA type, time reading the DA, physician informing quality and physician age did not predict booklet talk. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that good decision aids, systematically provided to patients, appeared to function not to open up deliberations about how to balance benefits and harms of competing treatments, but rather to allow patients to ask narrow technical questions about recommended treatments

Alternative medicine · Cancer · Decision aids · MEDLINE · Pathology · Prostate · Prostate cancer · Chemistry · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Internal Medicine

  • Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds

    Open Access•Laureline Guigon, Laura X Gil Sánchez et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • The Quality of Care

    Avedis Donabedian•JAMA•1988

  • Race, Gender, and Partnership in the Patient-Physician Relationship

    Lisa Cooper-Patrick•JAMA•1999

  • Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions

    Dawn Stacey, France Légaré et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2017

  • Informed Decision Making in Outpatient Practice

    Clarence H Braddock, Clarence H Braddock III et al.•JAMA•1999

  • Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn•BMJ•2006

  • Decision making during serious illness

    Open Access•Lesley F Degner, Jeffrey A Sloan•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•1992

  • Development of instruments to measure the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions

    Open Access•Clara N Lee, Rosalie Dominik et al.•Health Expectations•2010

  • Patient–physician communication about early stage prostate cancer

    Open Access•Stephen G Henry, Danielle Czarnecki et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • Patient–physician agreement on the content of CHD prevention discussions

    Open Access•Lindy Behrend, Hossein Maymani et al.•Health Expectations•2011

  • The Option scale

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn, Hayley Hutchings et al.•Health Expectations•2005

  • Patient–Provider Communication Differs for Black Compared to White HIV-Infected Patients

    Open Access•Mary Catherine Beach, Somnath Saha et al.•AIDS and Behavior•2010

  • Patient Race/Ethnicity and Quality of Patient–Physician Communication During Medical Visits

    Rachel L Johnson, Debra Roter et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2004

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae