Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A survey of women's preferences regarding alternative surgical treatments for menorrhagia

Bibliographic Data

ID19508845
AuthorsMark Sculpher (0000-0003-3746-9913, St Michaels Hospital, corresponding author), Mark J Sculpher, Nuala Dwyer (St Michaels Hospital), James Browning (St Michaels Hospital), Sue Horsley (Brunel University of London), John Cullimore
Year1998
Volume1
Issue2
Pages96-105
Publication date1998-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00006.x
PMID11281864
OpenAlexW2119009162
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited3

BACKGROUND: Menorrhagia represents a major health burden to a large number of women in the UK. A range of medical and surgical treatments is now available for the condition, but each has its own advantages and limitations. METHODS: A postal survey was undertaken of women with apparently uncomplicated menorrhagia referred to one of two NHS hospitals. The aim was to elicit women's preferences for the characteristics of surgical treatment and, specifically, to assess how they traded-off the characteristics of hysterectomy and minimal access surgery. RESULTS: A total of 221 women returned their questionnaire and were included in the study (59% of those sent out). The characteristics most frequently rated as 'very important' were getting back to usual activities as soon as possible (57%), experiencing the least pain and discomfort (46%), spending a short time in hospital (46%) and stopping periods for good (43%). The single characteristic most frequently rated as the most important by women was stopping periods for good (28%). Similar proportions of women preferred abdominal hysterectomy (43%) and endometrial resection (41%) when these were described to them. When asked to think about specific treatments of which they were aware, strong positive (43%) and negative (42%) preferences were indicated. Women's main information source was their general practitioner (70%), but only 44% considered themselves well-informed about menorrhagia and its treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Many women referred to hospital with menorrhagia have conflicting objectives for treatment, feel under-informed about therapies and have not formed treatment preferences. It is important to develop well-structured and accessible sources of information for women and methods to elicit their treatment preferences, and to evaluate the impact of such tools on treatment selection and outcomes

Family medicine · Hysterectomy · Endometriosis Research and Treatment · Medicine · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Uterine Myomas and Treatments · Surgery

  • Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making

    Open Access•José Joaquín Mira, Mercedes Guilabert et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Decisions about treatment

    Open Access•Vikki Entwistle, Vikki A Entwistle et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  • Shared treatment decision making in a collectively funded health care system

    Open Access•Mark Sculpher, Amiram Gafni et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • EuroQol

    Open Access•Richard Brooks•Health Policy•1996

  • Partnerships with Patients

    Open Access•Angela Coulter•Journal of Health Services…•1997

Citations per year0.12
Citation span2001 - 2014 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae