Co‐Designing a Community‐Based Health Literacy Programme for Individuals With Prehypertension
An Application of Ophelia (Optimise Health Literacy and Access) Process
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19508863 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pataporn Bawornthip (0000-0002-8023-4071, Deakin University, corresponding author), Jo McDonall (0000-0001-6696-6316, La Trobe University), Decha Tamdee (0000-0002-1121-0850, Chiang Mai University), Andrea Driscoll (0000-0002-6837-0249, Deakin University), Anastasia Hutchinson (0000-0002-0014-689X, Deakin University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | e70637-e70637 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Expectations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/hex.70637 |
| PMID | 41832631 |
| OpenAlex | W7136078753 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases, especially hypertension, presents a significant public health concern. Early detection and effective health promotion of hypertension remain challenging for healthcare providers. A co-design approach was used to engage stakeholders and consumers in exploring and developing a culturally appropriate intervention. This study aimed to co-design evidence-based resources with local key stakeholders, focusing on hypertension prevention for individuals with varying levels of literacy and addressing barriers to behaviour change in a rural Thai community. METHODS: This study was guided by the Optimising Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) framework, specifically steps 3 to 5, to codesign a hypertension prevention programme. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, based on recommendations from the health service advisory group. A total of 13 individuals - comprising consumers, healthcare providers, and community leaders - were invited to participate in a codesign workshop. Data were analysed using descriptive and content analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen workshop participants generated action ideas using Problem-Tree Analysis and the Rose, Thorn, Bud technique. These ideas were then prioritised using an Impact-Effort Matrix to determine feasible next steps. Interventions identified in the "quick wins" (do now) quadrant were selected for further development. The final health literacy interventions included: (1) a community-based educational project on hypertension; (2) a blood pressure monitoring system for individuals with prehypertension; and (3) public relations activities to raise community awareness. CONCLUSION: Co-design approaches underpinned by the Ophelia framework enable the development of tailored, culturally appropriate health literacy interventions that improve health outcomes and access to services by addressing the diverse, real-world needs of rural communities. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The co-design process involved engaging community leaders, health care providers, individuals with hypertension or prehypertension, and their family members throughout the research process
Community health · eHealth · Health care · Health literacy · Literacy · MEDLINE · Process (computing) · Qualitative research · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Health literacy and uptake of healthy diet and exercise amongst individuals with prehypertension in Thailand
Co-designing eHealth and Equity Solutions
Migrant Communities at the Center in Co-design of Health Literacy-Based Innovative Solutions for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Risk Reduction
Using Codesign to Develop a Health Literacy Intervention to Improve the Accessibility and Acceptability of Cardiac Services
Development of a User‐Centred Chronic Care Model for Patients With Heart Failure in a Limited‐Resource Setting
Health Literacy Co-Design in a Low Resource Setting
Systematic development and implementation of interventions to OPtimise Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia)
The Impact-Likelihood Matrix
| Highly cited | No |
|---|