Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Personal health communities

A phenomenological study of a new health‐care concept

Bibliographic Data

ID19508904
AuthorsJohanna W M Aarts (0000-0002-0674-9405, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Femke Vennik (Institute of Health Policy & Management (iBMG) Erasmus University Rotterdam DR Rotterdam the Netherlands), W L D M Nelen (0000-0003-2438-2261, Radboud University Nijmegen), Martijn van der Eijk (Department of Neurology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands), Bastiaan R Bloem (0000-0002-6371-3337, Department of Neurology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands), Marjan J Meinders (0000-0001-6491-7035, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands), Marjan J Faber (0000-0001-7198-2425, Radboud University Nijmegen), Jan A M Kremer (0000-0002-0495-0201, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands)
Year2015
Volume18
Issue6
Pages2091-2106
Publication date2015-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.12177
PMID24646089
OpenAlexW2024463989
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited35

CONTEXT: Fragmentation of care, complexity of diseases and the need to involve patients actively in their individual health care led to the development of the personal health community (PHC). In a PHC, patients can -regardless of the nature of their condition- invite all professionals that are involved in their health care process. Once gathered, the patient and health care team can exchange information about the patient's health and communicate through several functionalities, in a secured environment. OBJECTIVES: Exploring the use, first experiences and potential consequences of using PHCs in health care. DESIGN: Qualitative phenomenological study. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen respondents, consisting of women experiencing infertility (n = 5), persons with Parkinson's disease (n = 6), a gynaecologist, a fertility doctor, a fertility nurse, three Parkinson's specialist nurses and a neurologist. RESULTS: First experiences with PHCs showed that patients use their PHC differently, dependending on their condition and people involved. Various (potential) advantages for future health care were mentioned relating to both organizational aspects of care (e.g. continuity of care) and the human side of care (e.g. personal care). Patient involvement in care was facilitated. Disadvantages were the amount of work that it took and technological issues. CONCLUSIONS: Using PHCs leads to promising improvements in both the organization of care and care experience, according to the participants in this study. They indicate that patients with different diseases and in different circumstances can benefit from these improvements. The PHC seem to be an online tool that can be applied in a personalized way. When (technically) well facilitated, it could stimulate active involvement of patients in their own health and health care. It warrants further research to study its effect on concrete health outcomes

Health care · Qualitative research · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Psychology

  • Effects of a Personal Health Record in Maternity Care

    Open Access•Carola J M Groenen, Jan A M Kremer et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes

    Open Access•Jessica Greene, Judith H Hibbard•Journal of General Internal…•2012

  • Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

    Open Access•Neil Campbell, Neil C Campbell et al.•BMJ•2007

  • Qualitative research in health care

    Open Access•Catherine Pope•BMJ•2000

  • Qualitative content analysis in nursing research

    Open Access•Ulla Hällgren Graneheim, B Lundman•Nurse Education Today•2004

  • Qualitative Research in Health Care

    Open Access•Catherine Pope, Nicholas Mays•Qualitative research in health care•2006

  • An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development

    Open Access•Hester Van De Bovenkamp, Hester M Van De Bovenkamp et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • Choose Your Method

    Open Access•Helene Starks, Susan Brown Trinidad•Qualitative Health Research•2007

  • The Lived Experience of Women Pregnant (Including Preconception) Post In Vitro Fertilization Through the Lens of Virtual Communities

    Sharyl Eve Toscano, Rebecca M Montgomery•Health Care For Women International•2009

  • Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data

    Open Access•Richard H Hycner, Richard Hycner•Human Studies•1985

  • Concepts and a model for the comparison of medical systems as cultural systems

    Open Access•A Kleinman•Social Science & Medicine Part B…•1978

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae