Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Including Prisoners in Research Design

Codevelopment of a Practical Guidance Toolkit to Support Intervention Delivery to Address the Physical and Mental Health of Older Prisoners (Pamhop) Study

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19509167
AutoresAmanda Perry (0000-0002-0279-1884, Department of Health Sciences University of York York UK, autor correspondente), Thirimon Moe‐Byrne (0000-0002-2827-9715, Department of Health Sciences University of York York UK), J Schofield (0000-0001-6903-7395, Department of Archaeology University of York York UK), Lisa Ashton (0000-0003-1978-3423, Department of Health Sciences University of York York UK), Noemia Siqueria (Department of Health Sciences University of York York UK), Sarah Knowle (0000-0002-0863-5866, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) University of York York UK), R Churchill (0000-0002-1751-0512, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom)), Tim Colman (National Prison Radio Association London UK), Steve Parrott (0000-0002-0165-1150, Department of Health Sciences University of York York UK), Kevin Williamson (0000-0002-0039-210X, Rotherham Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust Doncaster UK)
Ano2025
Volume28
Fascículo3
Páginase70246-e70246
Data de publicação2025-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoHealth Expectations (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1369-6513 • E-ISSN: 1369-7625
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hex.70246
PMID40488546
OpenAlexW4411151715
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas49

INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade, the number of older people in custody with common mental and physical health problems has increased. Little is known about the effectiveness of interventions targeting this age group. OBJECTIVE: To codevelop a practical guidance toolkit(s) to support the delivery of interventions to benefit the common mental and physical health of older people in custody. METHODS: Twelve 3-h workshops between March and April 2023 were conducted with 26 participants at two prison sites in the North of England. The six workshops in each site consisted of research-based activities and interlinked taster sessions. The research data were collected by the research team to identify the causal links between common mental and physical health problems; activity preferences; the feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of delivering the activities and engagement barriers, which formed a bespoke questionnaire. The taster sessions (drugs and alcohol for males, chair yoga for females, books and crafting, and a historical session for both males and females) were delivered by the research team and prison staff. Feedback from the workshop participants was documented using an adapted questionnaire to record the experiences of those taking part. A micro-costing framework was used to estimate the cost. RESULTS: Similar common mental and physical health factors were listed by males and females. Symptoms of common mental health problems were improved by engaging with others of the same age, conducting activities outside and a consistent prison regime. Activity preferences (e.g., creative activities) were underpinned by a sense of purpose, learning new things, gaining and sharing skills. Engagement was supported by building good relationships and offering guidance through peer support, with activities led by staff of a similar age. Activities were more likely to be deemed feasible, acceptable and sustainable when aligned with the prison strategy and in conjunction with the regime. The average cost per participant for the intervention delivery was higher for males than females (£157 vs. £89). CONCLUSION: Older people in custody report high levels of mental and physical health problems. Engagement with people in custody helps to support the development of interventions maximising possible health benefits. Further research is required to develop an evidence-base for this group of people in custody. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: People in custody were involved in the design and implementation of the workshops. The Project Advisory Group advised us on our research methodology and evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and sustainability of the activities using a questionnaire; they also provided practical advice about the project delivery

Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Applied Psychology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Mental health of prisoners

    Open Access•Seena Fazel, ADRIAN HAYES et al.•The Lancet Psychiatry•2016

  • Adapting interventions to new contexts—the Adapt guidance

    Open Access•Graham Moore, Mhairi Campbell et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen•Implementation Science•2015

  • The health of prisoners

    Open Access•Seena Fazel, Jacques Baillargeon•The Lancet•2011

  • The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development

    Open Access•Liz Yardley, Linda Morrison et al.•Journal of Medical Internet…•2015

  • Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare

    Open Access•Alicia O’cathain, Elizabeth Croot et al.•BMJ Open•2019

  • Experience-based design

    Paul Bate, Glenn Robert•BMJ Quality & Safety•2006

  • A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism.

    Mark E Olver, Keira C Stockdale et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•2011

  • Better reporting of interventions

    Open Access•Tom Hoffmann, T C Hoffmann et al.•BMJ•2014

  • A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Robert L Spitzer, Carmen Pérez de los Ríos et al.•A.M.A. Archives of Internal…•2006

  • The PHQ-9

    Kurt Kroenke, Robert L Spitzer et al.•Journal of General Internal…•2001

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions

    Open Access•Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe et al.•BMJ•2008

  • Utilising survey data and qualitative information to inform a logic model to support older people in custody with common mental and physical health problems

    Open Access•Amanda Perry, Amanda E Perry et al.•International Journal of Law and…•2024

  • Patient and public involvement (PPI) in prisons

    Open Access•Samantha Treacy, Steven Andrew Martins et al.•Health & Justice•2021

  • ‘Taking time’

    Open Access•J Schofield, Thirimon Moe‐Byrne et al.•The Historic Environment Policy &…•2024

  • Doing Criminological Research

    Victor Jupp, Pamela Davies et al.•Doing Criminological Research•2000

  • Improving the quality of prison research

    Open Access•Yvonne Awenat, Currie Moore et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Empowering people to help speak up about safety in primary care

    Open Access•Sarah Knowle, Rebecca Hays et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • New and Emerging Challenges to Heritage and Well-Being

    Open Access•Paul S C Taçon, Baker•Heritage•2019

  • What theory, for whom and in which context? Reflections on the application of theory in the development and evaluation of complex population health interventions

    Open Access•Graham Moore, Rhiannon Evans•SSM - Population Health•2016

  • Strategies to Optimize the Use of Compassionate Release From US Prisons

    Stephanie Grace Prost, Brie Williams•American Journal of Public Health•2020

  • Involving incarcerated individuals in the research process

    Open Access•Mark E Johnson, Christiane Brems et al.•Action Research•2016

  • Research on the 'Inside

    Open Access•Nalita James•Sociological Research Online•2013

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae