Why the South African National Health Research Ethics Council is wrong about ownership of human biological material and data

The South African National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) states in its 2024 Ethics Guidelines that human biological material (HBM) and data cannot be privately owned under South African law. This position conflicts with established legal principles, guidelines by the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), and South African university policies, all of which support private ownership of HBM and data. Private ownership is not only legally sound but also ethically necessary, providing a framework for accountability, ensuring fair recognition of institutional contributions, and enabling responsible custodianship over these valuable resources. The NHREC's denial of private ownership of HBM and data undermines South African research institutions’ ability to control their research assets and leaves them vulnerable to exploitation by foreign entities. The NHREC should issue a corrigendum to delete its incorrect position on private ownership of HBM and data

Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Environmental health · Human health · Political science · Research ethics · Biomedical Ethics and Regulation · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Medicine · Philosophy

• Exploring the Challenges and Legal Implications of Secondary Use of Health Data in South Africa

  Open Access•Aliki Edgcumbe, Adéle Strydom et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2026

  Add to list