What Retractions Tell Us About Research Integrity in Mexican Academia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19516447 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karina Ordoñez‐Torres (0000-0003-3199-1137, Autonomous University of Chihuahua, corresponding author), Sergio Litewka (0000-0002-4196-5998, Institute for Bioethics and Health Policy University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami USA), Elizabeth Heitman (0000-0002-4855-8551, Program in Ethics in Science and Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Department of Applied Clinical Research University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developing World Bioethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1471-8731 • E-ISSN: 1471-8847 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/dewb.70011 |
| PMID | 41236125 |
| OpenAlex | W4416227082 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
Research integrity remains a challenge to public trust in science around the world. Retracted scientific papers can erode the public's trust by raising doubt about the reliability of the published literature. This paper assesses article retractions involving Mexican authors through analysis of relevant data and retraction patterns. The study examines 55 retracted articles with Mexican corresponding authors, categorizing them by publication venue, article type, scientific area, reasons for retraction, and time between publication and retraction. The findings underscore core challenges to research integrity in Mexico and the need to strengthen both research training and research integrity initiatives in Mexican research institutions. The paper concludes with recommendations for contextually relevant strategies for Mexican academia to foster research integrity
Academic integrity · Personal Integrity · Public trust · Research ethics · Research integrity · Scientific integrity · Scientific Misconduct · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Academic Publishing and Open Access · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Academic Research in the 21st Century
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility
A phenomenographic study of scientists’ beliefs about the causes of scientists’ research misconduct
The Past, Present, and Future of Mexico's National Bioethics Commission
| Highly cited | No |
|---|