Proportionality and Mexico's pandemic management during the Covid‐19 crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19516609 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Felicitas Holzer (0000-0002-3674-0241, corresponding author), Ivette M Ortiz Alcántara (0009-0000-5175-859X), Tobias Eichinger (0000-0003-3521-1919), Julian W März (0000-0001-7394-4617) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 302-309 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Developing World Bioethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1471-8731 • E-ISSN: 1471-8847 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/dewb.12429 |
| PMID | 37846486 |
| OpenAlex | W4387692299 |
| Language | EN |
Mexico's pandemic management and the absence of measures have been harshly criticized as being disproportionate. This paper examines whether the proportionality principle was properly applied to Mexico's COVID‐19 response and outlines three reasons against such an endeavor, namely (i) the content of “proportionate measures” remained insufficiently well defined, (ii) there were yet fundamental rights conflicts to resolve, and (iii) the situation was moreover characterized by epistemic uncertainty
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Crisis management · Environmental ethics · Law and economics · Pandemic · Political science · Sociology · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Virology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|