Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Establishing Clinical Trial Priorities for Military Global Health Research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19517081
AutoresLiza Dawson (0000-0002-0980-4107, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, autor de correspondencia), Hunter Jackson Smith (0000-0002-3591-588X, Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center), Fredrick Sawe (United States Army Medical Research Directorate - Africa)
Año2026
Volumen26
Número2
Páginas87-91
Fecha de publicación2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaDeveloping World Bioethics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1471-8731 • E-ISSN: 1471-8847
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/dewb.70037
PMID42183782
OpenAlexW7162291035
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas19

Military leaders must support health care and research to protect the health and readiness of their forces. Part of this effort entails conducting human subjects research to address current and emerging international health threats. The military is also attentive to the national security interests associated with global health, such as protection from widespread disruption due to disasters and epidemics. While military leaders’ global health research objectives relate to the military's strategic goals, including force health protection and national security, it is only through longstanding partnerships with partner nations in several world regions that much of the relevant research is possible. Yet military priorities may differ starkly from those of the collaborating partner nations, raising concerns about the potential for exploitation in global health partnerships. However, in spite of differences in overall strategic priorities, a convergence of stakeholder interests allows for appropriate alignment in the choice of clinical research activities at global health sites supported by the military. These complex collaborative research arrangements depend on negotiating and navigating the selection of research goals and activities to ensure fairness and balancing of priorities among partners, thereby maintaining research infrastructure and capacity. Leaders of military institutions and partner nations must attend to the need for this sustained effort to balance priorities to ensure equity and successful maintenance of these essential relationships

Clinical trial · Equity (law) · Global health · Health care · Medical research · Negotiation · Research ethics · Stakeholder · Global Health and Surgery · Global Security and Public Health · Health and Conflict Studies

  • Global health security

    Open Access•David L Heymann, Lincoln Chen et al.•The Lancet•2015

  • Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma

    Derrick Bell, Derrick A Bell•Harvard Law Review•1980

  • Embed capacity development within all global health research

    Open Access•Ayôla Akim Adégnika, John Amuasi et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Maintaining international research collaborations in the setting of a pandemic

    Open Access•Muhammad Karyana, Herman Kosasih et al.•Journal of Global Health•2021

  • Good collaborative practice

    Open Access•Claire Leonie Ward, David Shaw et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

  • Media reporting of tenofovir trials in Cambodia and Cameroon

    Open Access•Edward Mills, Edward J Mills et al.•BMC International Health and…•2005

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae