Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assistive technology use and human rights enjoyment

A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh

Bibliographic Data

ID19517510
AuthorsJohan Borg (0000-0003-4432-5256, Lund University, corresponding author), Stig Larsson (0000-0002-0921-0878, Lund University), Per-Olof Östergren (0000-0002-7903-6668, Lund University), ASM Atiqur Rahman (University of Dhaka), Nazmul Bari (Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed), AHM Noman Khan (Centre for the Rehabilitation of the Paralysed)
Year2012
Volume12
Issue1
Pages18-18
Publication date2012-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMC International Health and Human Rights (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1472-698X • E-ISSN: 1472-698X
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/1472-698x-12-18
PMID22992413
PMCIDPMC3519502
OpenAlexW2146518979
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited25

BACKGROUND: About half a billion people with disabilities in developing countries have limited access to assistive technology. The Convention on the Rights of persons with Disabilities requires governments to take measures to ensure provision of such technologies. To guide implementation of these measures there is a need for understanding health outcomes from a human rights perspective. The objective of this study was therefore to explore the relation between assistive technology use and enjoyment of human rights in a low-income country. METHODS: Data was collected in eight districts of Bangladesh through interviews of people with hearing impairments using and not using hearings aids, and people with ambulatory impairments using and not using manual wheelchairs (N = 583). Using logistic regression, self-reported outcomes on standard of living, health, education, work, receiving information and movement were analyzed. RESULTS: The adjusted likelihood of reporting greater enjoyment of human rights was significantly higher among people using hearing aids compared to non-users for all outcomes except working status. Compared to non-users, users of wheelchairs reported a significantly higher adjusted likelihood of good ambulatory performance and a significantly lower adjusted likelihood of reporting a positive working status. Further analyses indicated that physical accessibility to working places and duration of wheelchair use had a statistically significant impact on the likelihood of reporting positive work outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the notion that assistive technology use increases the likelihood of human rights enjoyment, particularly hearing aid use. Physical accessibility should always be addressed in wheelchair provision

Cross-sectional study · Environmental health · Human rights · Political science · Wheelchair · Applied Psychology · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Disability Rights and Representation · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Medicine · Psychology · Gerontology

  • Development and evaluation of a wheelchair service provision training of trainers programme

    Open Access•Sara Múnera, MARY GOLDBERG et al.•African Journal of Disability•2017

  • Is ‘legal empowerment of the poor’ relevant to people with disabilities in developing countries? An empirical and normative review

    Open Access•Johan Borg, Anna-Karin Bergman et al.•Global Health Action•2013

  • A conceptual framework to assess effectiveness in wheelchair provision

    Open Access•Deepan C Kamaraj, Nathan Bray et al.•African Journal of Disability•2017

  • Unmet Needs and Use of Assistive Products in Two Districts of Bangladesh

    Open Access•Wesley Pryor, Nguyễn Thanh Liêm et al.•International Journal of…•2018

  • What predicts the proxy-reported health-related quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Rosalie Power, Claire Galea et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • Comparison of outpatient coverage in Canada

    Open Access•Allie Peckham, Fiona A Miller et al.•Health Policy•2021

  • Do Assistive Products Enhance or Equalize Opportunities? A Comparison of Capability across Persons with Impairments Using and Not Using Assistive Products and Persons without Impairments in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Johan Borg, Natasha Layton et al.•Societies•2022

  • A tale of triple disadvantages

    Open Access•Vidya Diwakar•Global Social Policy•2022

  • Human Development Report 2009

    United Nations Development Programme•Human Development Report 2009•2009

  • What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities

    Joy Hammel, Susan Magasi et al.•Disability and Rehabilitation•2008

  • Social determinants of health inequalities

    Open Access•Michael Marmot•The Lancet•2005

  • Human rights, health and the state in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Redwanur Rahman, Redwanur M Rahman•BMC International Health and…•2006

  • What You See May Not Be What You Get

    Open Access•Michael A Babyak•Psychosomatic Medicine•2004

  • Poverty, Social Exclusion and the Politics of Disability

    Open Access•Dermot Foley, Jahan Chowdhury•Social Policy and Administration•2007

  • The state of health determinants in Bangladesh

    M Redwanur Rahman, Redwanur Rahman et al.•International Journal of…•2000

  • Equity Gains in Bangladesh Primary Education

    Open Access•A Mushtaque R Chowdhury, Rajiv Chowdhury et al.•International Review of Education•2003

  • Development of a questionnaire for quantitative assessment in the field of health and human rights

    Open Access•Manfred Wildner, Richela Fischer et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

    Open Access•John D Humphrey, John P Humphrey•International Journal Canada s…•1949

  • Human Development Report, 1997

    Victor D Lippit•Economic Development and Cultural…•2000

Citations per year0.62
Citation span2013 - 2022 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae