Value Capture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19524847 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C Thi Nguyen (0000-0001-8062-5446, University of Utah, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 469-504 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1559-3061 • E-ISSN: 1559-3061 |
| Publisher | Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.26556/jesp.v27i3.3048 |
| OpenAlex | W4398253404 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 40 |
Value capture occurs when an agent’s values are rich and subtle—or developing in that direction. The agent enters a social environment that presents simplified—typically quantified—versions of those values; and those simplified articulations come to dominate their practical reasoning. Examples include becoming motivated by FitBit’s step counts, Twitter likes and retweets, citation rates, ranked lists of best schools, and grade point averages. We are vulnerable to value capture because of the competitive advantage that such crisp and clear expressions of value have in our private reasoning and our public justification. But value capture poses several threats. First, value capture threatens to change the goals of our activities, in a way that often threatens to undermine the value of those activities. Twitter’s scoring system threatens to replace some of the richer goals of communication—understanding, connection, and the mutual pursuit of truth—with the thinner goals of getting likes and going viral. Second, in value capture, we take a core process of our autonomy and self-governance—our ongoing deliberation over the exact articulation of our values—and we outsource it. That outsourcing cuts off one of the key benefits to self-governing deliberation. In value capture, we no longer adjust our values and their articulations in light of own rich particular and context-sensitive experience of the world. Our values should be carefully tailored to our particular selves and particular communities, but in value capture, we buy our values off the rack
Epistemology · Statistics · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · Mathematics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy
The nihilism industry
The message hidden within the pattern
You are your numbers
Moral Roleplaying and Gamification of the Moral Space
Against Proxy Optimization
Global justice and the use of AI in education
Plato Under Review
Gamification and the virtue of perspective
Information Poverty
Legibility and Agency
The Risk of Value Capture for AI Psychotherapy Chatbots
ChatGPT and Writing Assignments
Self‐Respect and Justice
Data roles
Love of Status
Shared Agency
Willing, Wanting, Waiting
The Seductions of Quantification
Data-Centric Biology
The secret life of fluency
Minds
Democratic Reason
IX-On Being Bored Out of Your Mind
Joint Commitment
Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves
The Feminist Case Against Relational Autonomy
Trust and Sincerity in Art
The Seductions of Clarity
The Retrieval of Ethics
Games
Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression
Sorting Things Out
Group Agency
‘My Fitbit Thinks I Can Do Better!’ Do Health Promoting Wearable Technologies Support Personal Autonomy
Trust in Numbers
The Deferential Wife Revisited
No understanding without explanation
What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework
Selflessness and Responsibility for Self
Games and the Art of Agency
Transparency is Surveillance
Aspiration
The Bounds of Agency An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics
Deformed Desires and Informed Desire Tests
| Citations per year | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |