Pastoralism and Resulting Challenges for National Parks in Afar, Ethiopia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19527273 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Samson Abebe (Armauer Hansen Research Institute), Hamere Melaku, Ashenafi GebreGiorgis Kidanu (Armauer Hansen Research Institute), Rea Tschopp (0000-0001-8435-0259, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 2-4 |
| Pages | 195-208 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | EcoHealth (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1612-9202 • E-ISSN: 1612-9210 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-024-01687-6 |
| PMID | 38819755 |
| OpenAlex | W4399245258 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 47 |
Pastoralists and national parks are key stakeholders in the management and conservation of natural and protected habitats. In Ethiopia, Afar pastoralists migrate seasonally with their livestock in search for grazing and water areas. Livestock are also a source of infectious diseases that can spread into wildlife populations when pastoralists encroach into unfenced national parks. The interactions between pastoralists and national parks, as well as the subsequent impacts, remain insufficiently understood in Afar. Two structured questionnaire surveys were conducted in 2021, including 300 pastoralist households in seven woredas of Afar, and 58 staff from three national parks (Awash, Alidegi and Yangudi Rassa). They captured pastoralist movements and livestock diseases as well as the perception of national park staff regarding challenges resulting from pastoral encroachment into parks. Among the pastoralists, 74.7% migrated with their livestock for a mean 3.5 months per year, during which time, 90% of respondents reported contact with other livestock herds, and over 80% with wildlife. A third (34.2%) reported disease outbreaks in their village prior to migration. Pastoralists traveled long distances, crossing woreda, regional or national boundaries. All 58-park respondents reported pastoralists with livestock inside their park and their close contact with wildlife. Additionally, 69% reported the presence of domestic dogs. Wildlife displacement, habitat loss and dog attacks on wildlife were perceived as the main threat caused by the presence of pastoralists, whereas diseases were only mentioned by 15.5%. Overall, park staff showed poor disease knowledge. They reported poor disease surveillance and no disease response. Within pastoral contexts, improved collaboration between wildlife and livestock authorities regarding land use, disease awareness and surveillance is needed to balance the needs of both wildlife and pastoralist’s livestock development and mitigate threats to wildlife habitats
Agroforestry · Animal ecology · Biology · Environmental protection · Environmental resource management · Geography · Grazing · Livestock · National park · Pastoralism · Socioeconomics · Wildlife · Wildlife conservation · Wildlife management · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology · Environmental Science · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Zoonotic diseases and public health · Ecology · Forestry
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |