Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Assessment of content validity for a Neonatal Near miss Scale in the context of Ethiopia

Bibliographic Data

ID19530051
AuthorsMengstu Melkamu Asaye (0000-0001-7889-5578, University of Gondar, corresponding author), Kassahun Alemu Gelaye (0000-0003-4647-5178, University of Gondar), Yohannes Hailu Matebe (0000-0001-5604-465X, University of Gondar), Helena Lindgren (0000-0002-4875-1407, Karolinska University Hospital), Kerstin Erlandsson (0000-0002-6910-7047, Dalarna University)
Year2021
Volume14
Issue1
Pages1983121-1983121
Publication date2021-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobal Health Action (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1654-9716 • E-ISSN: 1654-9880
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/16549716.2021.1983121
PMID34694977
OpenAlexW3210114495
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited27

BACKGROUND: The concept of neonatal near miss is used to identify neonates who nearly died but survived a life-threatening complication in the first 28 days of life. Neonatal mortality is the tip of the iceberg. Quality improvement through utilization of a validated scale and reduction in adverse neonatal outcome is a priority for achieving sustainable development goals. OBJECTIVES: To develop and assess the content validity of neonatal near-miss scale in the public health hospitals in Amhara Regional State, northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A literature review was performed prior to the development of the neonatal near-miss assessment scale. An expert panel committee was formed by health facility practitioners and by the members of the academia. Two rounds of meetings were conducted with the expert panel to reach consensus on the face and content validity. The content validity index, Kappa statistics, and the content validity ratio were computed to estimate the content validity scale of neonatal near miss. RESULTS: In this study, four domains (pragmatic, clinical, management, and lab-investigations) with 32 items were identified. The item-level content validity index ranged from 0.7 to 1. The overall scale content validity (S-CVI) (average) for the domains (pragmatic, clinical, management, and lab-investigations) were 0.98, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.96, respectively. The overall S-CVI (universal) was 0.78 to 1, whereas the overall S-CVI (average) of neonatal near miss assessment scale was found to be 0.96. The content validity ratio and Kappa statistics values ranged from 0.6 to 1 and 0.9 to 1 for the respective domains. CONCLUSION: The identified four domains and the respective items were valid enough (content-wise) to be used as identification criteria for neonatal near-miss cases. The scale will contribute to neonatal near-miss identification and also improve the quality of neonatal management care

Cartography · Content validity · Face validity · Geography · Psychometrics · Validity · Clinical Psychology · Health Education and Validation · Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine

  • Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Mengstu Melkamu Asaye, Kassahun Alemu Gelaye et al.•Global Health Action•2022

  • Determinants of neonatal near-miss among neonates delivered in public hospitals of Ilu Abba Bor Zone, Southwest Ethiopia

    Open Access•Gebiso Roba Debele, Sabit Zenu et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2022

  • Evaluation of the reliability and validity of a Caregivers’ Complementary Feeding Practice Scale (CCFPS) for children aged 6–23 months in urban areas of China

    Open Access•Qiong Wu, Na Meng et al.•Journal of Global Health•2025

  • Development and validation of a prognosis risk score model for neonatal mortality in the Amhara region, Ethiopia. A prospective cohort study

    Open Access•Mengstu Melkamu Asaye, Yohannes Hailu Matebe et al.•Global Health Action•2024

  • Design and Implementation Content Validity Study

    Open Access•Vahid Zamanzadeh, Akram Ghahramanian et al.•Journal of Caring Sciences•2015

  • “Every Newborn-BIRTH” protocol

    Open Access•Louise T Day, Harriet Ruysen et al.•Journal of Global Health•2019

  • Critérios pragmáticos da definição de near miss neonatal

    Open Access•Pauline Lorena Kale, Maria Helena P De Mello Jorge et al.•Revista de Saúde Pública•2017

  • Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio

    Colin Ayre, Andy Scally et al.•Measurement and Evaluation in…•2013

  • Survival and negotiation

    Open Access•Livia Wick•Reproductive Health Matters•2017

  • Content Validity of Assessment Instrument for Employee Engagement

    Open Access•Vijay Kumar Shrotryia, Upasana Dhanda•SAGE Open•2019

Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae