Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Global health governance performance during Covid-19, what needs to be changed? a delphi survey study

Bibliographic Data

ID19533812
AuthorsWafa Abu El Kheir‐Mataria (0000-0002-9689-5667, American University in Cairo), Wafa Abu El Kheir-Mataria, Hassan El-Fawal, Hassan A N El‐Fawal (0000-0002-9694-0405, American University in Cairo), Sungsoo Chun (0000-0002-8105-7062, American University in Cairo, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume19
Issue1
Pages24-24
Publication date2023-03-31
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12992-023-00921-0
PMID37004079
OpenAlexW4362521967
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited28

BACKGROUND: Covid-19 is not the first pandemic to challenge GHG. Preceding outbreaks and epidemics were sources of continuous debate on GHG leadership and structure resulting in its current structure. However, Covid-19 proved the presence of many deficits in the current GHG. The response to the Covid-19 pandemic is a cumulative result of all policies and actions of different governments and agencies active in global health. Assessing how Covid-19 is being handled globally provides lessons for ensuring better performance in facing upcoming outbreaks. This study has three main objectives: first, to evaluate the performance of GHG during Covid-19 in general and in relation to Covid-19 vaccine equity in particular. Second, to identify the reasons behind this performance; and third, to propose prospective changes in GHG for better performance. METHODS: A cross-sectional research design using the Delphi method was applied. A panel of experts participated in the three-round Delphi surveys. Their scores were used to perform consensus, performance and correlation analysis. RESULTS: GHG performance limited the achievement of Covid-19 vaccines' global equity. GHG performance is a product of the existing GHG system, its actors and legal framework. It is a collective result of individual GHG actors' performance. The most influential actors in decision-making regarding Covid-19 vaccine are the vaccine manufacturers and governments. While the most invoked power to influence decision are economic and political powers. Covid-19 decisions underlying value, although had human right to health at the base, overlooked the concept of health as a global public good and was skewed towards market-oriented values. GHG mal-performance along with its underlying factors calls for four main changes in GHG structure: assigning a clear steward for GHG, enhanced accountability, centralized authority, more equitable representation of actors, and better legal framework. CONCLUSION: GHG structure, actors' representation, accountability system, and underlying priorities and value require future modification for GHG to achieve better future performance and higher health equity levels

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Corporate governance · Delphi method · Disease · Economics · Health administration · Health services research · Management · Outbreak · Pandemic · Political science · Public health · Social policy · Computer Science · Global Health and Surgery · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Health Policy · Virology

  • Developing and Validating a Global Governance Framework for Health

    Open Access•Kadria Ali Abdel-Motaal, Sungsoo Chun•International Journal of…•2026

  • Covid-19 vaccine intercountry distribution inequality and its underlying factors

    Open Access•Wafa Abu El Kheir‐Mataria, Wafa Abu El Kheir-Mataria et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Strategizing global health governance

    Open Access•Shisong Jiang, Emmanuel Kumah•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • China and the WHO pandemic treaty

    Open Access•Ying Huang, Shisong Jiang et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • The Delphi method as a research tool

    Open Access•Chitu Okoli, Suzanne D Pawlowski•Information & Management•2004

  • Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care

    Open Access•Saskia Jünger, Sheila A Payne et al.•Palliative Medicine•2017

  • Challenges and Approaches of the Global Governance of Public Health Under Covid-19

    Open Access•Hu Zhang, Zhang Hu•Frontiers in Public Health•2021

  • Give more data, awareness and control to individual citizens, and they will help Covid-19 containment

    Open Access•Mirco Nanni, Gennady Andrienko et al.•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • Consensus measurement in Delphi studies

    Open Access•Heiko A von der Gracht•Technological Forecasting and…•2012

  • Redressing Covid-19 vaccine inequity amidst booster doses

    Open Access•Sudhan Rackimuthu, K Narain et al.•Globalization and Health•2022

  • The multiple meanings of global health governance

    Open Access•K Lee, Adam Kamradt-Scott et al.•Globalization and Health•2014

  • Global health inequalities and the need for solidarity

    Open Access•Mbih Jerome Tosam, Primus Che et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2018

  • The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of Covid-19 Vaccines

    Open Access•Zhehan Li, Jiajun Lu et al.•INQUIRY The Journal of Health…•2021

  • Global Governance as the Friendly Face of Unaccountable Power

    Open Access•Jim Whitman•Security Dialogue•2002

  • Reimagining Global Health Governance in the Age of Covid-19

    Lawrence O Gostin, Suerie Moon et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2020

  • National, Regional, and Global Governance

    Elke Krahmann•Global Governance A Review of…•2003

Citations per year1.33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae