Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Africa’s Critical Role in Shaping and Implementing the Pandemic Agreement’s Pabs Annex in an Era of Fragmentation

Bibliographic Data

ID19534009
AuthorsNelson Aghogho Evaborhene (0000-0001-7712-6363, Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume22
Issue1
Publication date2026-03-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12992-026-01190-3
PMID41832575
OpenAlexW7135397387
LanguageEN
References cited12

The adoption of the World Health Organization Pandemic Agreement in May 2025 marked a political commitment to stronger global pandemic preparedness. Its credibility, however, depends on the successful negotiation and implementation of the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing annex under Article 12, to be finalized by April 2026. The COVID 19 pandemic exposed the failures of voluntary global health mechanisms, as African countries rapidly shared pathogen samples and sequence data yet faced severe delays in access to vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics. The PABS annex therefore represents the core test of whether the Agreement can move beyond symbolic equity toward enforceable obligations. This commentary argues that African countries enter the PABS negotiations with an unusual convergence of leverage: early scientific contributions, expanding regulatory and manufacturing capacity, and coordinated diplomacy through the African Union and Africa CDC. In a fragmented multilateral environment dominated by high income state interests, the central challenge is not recognition but conversion of capacity into binding rules. African negotiators have responded by pushing for standardized contracts, traceability of pathogen materials and sequence information, and compliance mechanisms that condition access on enforceable benefit sharing. Drawing on Africa’s institutional readiness, the paper contends that the continent is positioned not merely to influence the PABS annex, but to co-design its operational architecture. Whether this potential is realized will determine if the Pandemic Agreement corrects past inequities or reproduces them under a new legal form

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Fragmentation (computing) · Health services research · Pandemic · Public health · Social policy · Global Security and Public Health · Human Rights and Development · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research

  • The WHO pandemic treaty

    Open Access•Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene, Jessica Oga et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • The Pandemic Treaty, the Pandemic Fund, and the Global Commons

    Open Access•Nelson Aghogho Evaborhene, Echezona Ejike Udokanma et al.•BMJ Global Health•2023

  • The Trump presidency

    Open Access•Lawrence O Gostin, Olivier J Wouters Olivier J Wouters•PLOS Global Public Health•2025

  • Health equity requires transformational change

    Open Access•Els Torreele, Heather Sherwin et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2024

  • Innovative health financing mechanisms

    Open Access•Chiamaka P Ojiako•Health Policy and Planning•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae