Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Benefits of global partnerships to facilitate access to medicines in developing countries

A multi-country analysis of patients and patient outcomes in Gipap

Bibliographic Data

ID19534173
AuthorsPanos Kanavos (0000-0001-9518-3089, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Sotiris Vandoro (0000-0002-9458-4988, London School of Economics and Political Science), Sotiris Vandoros, Pat Garcia-Gonzalez (0000-0002-4544-9253)
Year2009
Volume5
Issue1
Pages19
Publication date2009-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/1744-8603-5-19
PMID20043820
PMCIDPMC2806257
OpenAlexW1993537774
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited4

BACKGROUND: Access to medicines in developing countries continues to be a significant problem due to lack of insurance and lack of affordability. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), a rare disease, can be treated effectively, but the pharmaceutical treatment available (imatinib) is costly and unaffordable by most patients. GIPAP, is a programme set up between a manufacturer and an NGO to provide free treatment to eligible CML patients in 80 countries worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of patients participating in GIPAP; to research the impact GIPAP is having on health outcomes (survival) of assistance-eligible CML patients; and to discuss the determinants of such outcomes and whether there are any variations according to socio-economic, demographic, or geographical criteria. METHODS: Data for 13,568 patients across 15 countries, available quarterly, were analysed over the 2005-2007 period. Ordered Probit panel data analysis was used to analyze the determinants of a patient's progress in terms of participation in the programme. Four waves of patients entering quarterly in 2005 were used to evaluate patient survival over the sample period. RESULTS: All patients in the sample are eligible to receive treatment provided they report to a facility quarterly. 62.3% of patients were male and 37.7% female. The majority (84.4%) entered during the chronic phase of the disease and their average age was 38.4 years. Having controlled for age, location and occupation, the analysis showed that patients were significantly much more likely to move towards a better health state after receiving treatment irrespective of their disease stage at the point of entry to the program (OR = 30.5, alpha = 1%); and that the larger the gap between diagnosis and approval for participation in the program, the more likely it is that patients' condition deteriorates (OR = 0.995, alpha = 1%), due to absence of treatment. Regressions to account for the effect of large countries (India, China, Pakistan) did not show any important differences when compared to the remaining countries in the sample. Survival analysis shows that at least 66 percent of all patients that entered the program in 2005 were alive and active by the end of 2007. CONCLUSIONS: GIPAP has a significant positive effect on patient access to important medicines for a life threatening condition such as CML. It impacts both the progress and phase of the disease and leads to a high survival rate. Overall, it sets a good example for access to treatment in developing countries, where such programmes can substitute or complement local efforts to provide care to eligible patients

Developing country · Disease · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Health economics · Health services research · Imatinib · Myeloid leukemia · Public health · Demography · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Nursing · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical studies and practices · Internal Medicine

  • Globalization and Health

    Open Access•Greg Martins, GREG MARTIN et al.•Globalization and Health•2016

  • A pharmacovigilance system for treatment access and medical donation programs

    Open Access•Ann Kim Novakowski, Ann Novakowski et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

  • Assessing aid

    World Bank•Assessing aid•1998

  • Improving Transparency in Pharmaceutical Systems

    Jillian Clare Cohen, James A Cercone et al.•2002

  • Consumer out-of-pocket spending for pharmaceuticals in Kazakhstan

    Open Access•Nazmi Sari•Health Policy and Planning•2001

  • The emergence of global health partnerships as facilitators of access to medication in Africa

    Open Access•Michael Zisuh Ngoasong•Social Science & Medicine•2009

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2016 - 2018 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae