Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The bioscience revolution & the biological weapons threat

Levers & interventions

Bibliographic Data

ID19534324
AuthorsMark D'Agostino, Mark D’Agostino (Brown University), Greg Martins (0000-0002-3095-111X, University College London), GREG MARTIN (0000-0001-8200-7422)
Year2009
Volume5
Issue1
Pages3
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/1744-8603-5-3
PMID19220910
PMCIDPMC2653473
OpenAlexW2012397196
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited3

In December 2008, the US Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, released a report, World At Risk. The Report points to the fact that, not only is the use of a weapon of mass destruction in a terrorist attack before the end of 2013, more likely than not, but also to the fact that terrorists are more likely to be able to obtain and use biological weapons than nuclear. This paper examines the recommendations of the report in the context of the historic and geopolitical changes, in particular globalization. The authors highlight the "dual-use" dilemma, as described in the report, as the paradoxical use of technology developed for the benefit of mankind being used for sinister purposes. The mitigation of such a threat lies in broad stakeholder involvement and cooperation, including non-state actors, governments and the bio-tech industry itself. The importance of vigilance measures within the life science community is emphasized and, the authors propose, could include a web-based didactic course in bioterrorism and weapons of mass destruction identification. The site could outline safety protocols, have detailed disaster management tutorials, and could be specifically tailored for different subsets of industry and health professionals. The paper concludes with an endorsement of a multi-pronged approach including strong international guidelines and intelligence cooperation and preparatory measures such as the wide-spread use of detection systems as well as diagnostic decision support systems for bioterrorism detection at the local level

Biological warfare · Commission · Dilemma · Environmental health · International community · Poison control · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Stakeholder · Terrorism · Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research · Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research · Law · Medicine

  • Globalization and Health

    Open Access•Greg Martins, GREG MARTIN et al.•Globalization and Health•2016

  • Planning and preparing for public health threats at airports

    Open Access•GREG MARTIN, Regina Murphy et al.•Globalization and Health•2018

  • Biotechnology and Bioterrorism

    Christopher F Chyba, Alex L Greninger et al.•Survival•2004

  • Biotechnology and Bioterrorism

    Christopher F Chyba•Survival•2004

  • The Arms Trade

    William W Keller, Janne E Nolan•Foreign Policy•1997

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2016 - 2018 (3)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae